1997
DOI: 10.1080/j148v15n01_03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balance Abilities of Community Dwelling Older Adults Under Altered Visual and Support Surface Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, we found that standing on foam resulted in reach distances that were lower than TFR. These findings are in agreement with previous research that has shown decrements in postural control when standing balance is assessed on foam as compared to a firm surface [20‐22]. What we did not expect was that, for both balance confidence groups, the context involving foam and an object present (OPFRF) resulted in reach distances that exceeded TFR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As expected, we found that standing on foam resulted in reach distances that were lower than TFR. These findings are in agreement with previous research that has shown decrements in postural control when standing balance is assessed on foam as compared to a firm surface [20‐22]. What we did not expect was that, for both balance confidence groups, the context involving foam and an object present (OPFRF) resulted in reach distances that exceeded TFR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This particular balance test is based on the original Romberg test (Romberg 1853) and was also included as a component of the Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (Shumway-Cook & Horak 1986). Some individuals with vestibular loss lose their balance when attempting this test (Cohen et al 1993;Alhanti et al 1997;Cohen et al 2014a). However, not all investigations of the FOEC test have demonstrated a relationship with vestibular function in older adults (Lord et al 1991;Jacobson et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased sway when standing on a foam cushion with eyes closed may be due to reduced vestibular function or reduced proprioception (Isableu & Vuillerme 2006;Anson et al 2017). The ability to stand on FOEC depends on intact sensory reweighting ability to prevent loss of balance since head motion in space may be incongruent with ankle motion because of the foam cushion (Choy et al 2003;Cohen et al 1993;Alhanti et al 1997). Age related proprioceptive or vestibular impairment could reduce sensory redundancy and make sensory reweighting more difficult via reduced or less accurate sensory signals (Horak & Hlavacka 2001;Horak et al 1990;Ko et al 2015;Deshpande et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests cyclists use a more tightly regulated postural control strategy that may relate to higher stability [21]. Given the role of vision in postural control [22][23][24] it is likely that removal of visual input increased center of pressure variability in eyes closed trials to the extent that significant differences could no longer be detected between cycling and non-cycling groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%