Balance Assessment during the Landing Phase of Jump-Down in Healthy Men and Male Patients after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

doi:10.12700/aph.12.6.2015.6.5

Cited by 3 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Force Plate (Measurement System 1): Force plates were used in 59/66 (89.4%) studies. Of the 59 included studies, 53 (89.8%) assessed landing only [12, 13, 30, 31, 41, 43, 49, 52, 54–56, 60–62, 68, 76, 79, 80, 84–90, 102, 103, 107, 110, 115–118, 120, 127, 129, 142, 146, 149, 150, 153, 156, 158–160, 163, 170, 172, 176, 177, 181, 182, 184], 3 studies assessed jumping only [16, 53, 144], and the remaining 3 studies assessed jumping and landing together [83, 114, 122].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Different jumping platforms were used across the included studies . In 37 (62.7%) studies [12, 13, 30, 31, 41, 43, 49, 54–56, 60, 62, 68, 76, 79, 80, 87, 90, 107, 115, 116, 127, 129, 146, 149, 150, 153, 156, 158–160, 170, 172, 176, 181, 182], participants jumped off a box that ranged in height from 10 to 60 cm, with a median height of 30 cm, onto force plates. The box was placed just behind the force plate in 27 (45.8%) studies [41, 43, 49, 54, 56, 60, 62, 68, 76, 79, 80, 87, 107, 114–116, 127, 129, 146, 150, 156, 158–160, 170, 181, 182], and at a distance that ranged between 10 cm to 50% of participant’s height in 10 (16.9%) studies [12, 13, 30, 31, 55,…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding participants’ preparation , participants were asked to warm up prior to testing in 18 (30.5%) studies [16, 31, 43, 49, 53, 55, 68, 76, 79, 80, 85, 86, 107, 117, 118, 146, 163, 184]. There was substantial heterogeneity in warm up duration and components across the studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Participants were barefoot in 5 (8.5%) studies [16, 68, 102, 103, 129], and wore shoes in 20 (33.9%) studies [13, 49, 52, 60, 61, 76, 79, 80, 84–86, 88, 89, 120, 146, 149, 159, 176, 177, 181]. The remaining 34 (57.6%) studies did not specify whether participants wore shoes or not [12, 30, 31, 41, 43, 53–56, 62, 83, 87, 90, 107, 110, 114–118, 122, 127, 142, 144, 150, 153, 156, 158, 160, 163, 170, 172, 181, 184]. Of 22 (37.3%) papers that reported hand placement while testing, 18 studies requested participants to keep hands on hips [16, 41, 49, 53, 56, 68, 76, 79, 83, 88, 89,…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the studies that reported on jump type, 8 studies requested participants to perform counter movement jumps (CMJ) [24,83,88,89,117,118,142,144], 3 required participants to perform squat jumps [16,52,53], 1 study reported vertical jumps while not allowing for countermovement [86], and 3 studies requested participants to do lateral jumps over hurdles of different heights (15 to 24 cm) and then rebound [102,103,163]. Of those studies that performed a drop landing, only 2 studies instructed participants to land on their toes [49,107].…”

Section: Landing/jumpingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Kinetic measurement system use in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review of methodological approaches

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Our primary objectives were to (1) describe current approaches for kinetic measurements in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and (2) suggest considerations for methodological reporting. Secondarily, we explored the relationship between kinetic measurement system findings and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods We followed the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O’Malley’s 6-stage framework. Seven electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to June 2020. Original research papers reporting parameters measured by kinetic measurement systems in individuals at least 6-months post primary ACLR were included. Results In 158 included studies, 7 kinetic measurement systems (force plates, balance platforms, pressure mats, force-measuring treadmills, Wii balance boards, contact mats connected to jump systems, and single-sensor insoles) were identified 4 main movement categories (landing/jumping, standing balance, gait, and other functional tasks). Substantial heterogeneity was noted in the methods used and outcomes assessed; this review highlighted common methodological reporting gaps for essential items related to movement tasks, kinetic system features, justification and operationalization of selected outcome parameters, participant preparation, and testing protocol details. Accordingly, we suggest considerations for methodological reporting in future research. Only 6 studies included PROMs with inconsistency in the reported parameters and/or PROMs. Conclusion Clear and accurate reporting is vital to facilitate cross-study comparisons and improve the clinical application of kinetic measurement systems after ACLR. Based on the current evidence, we suggest methodological considerations to guide reporting in future research. Future studies are needed to examine potential correlations between kinetic parameters and PROMs.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Landing/jumpingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Kinetic measurement system use in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review of methodological approaches

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Movement Tracking in Augmented and Mixed Realities Impacting the User Activity in Medicine and Healthcare

Nikodem

Klempous

Segen

et al. 2023

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Determination of spatial position of tibial graft using X-ray images after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aim. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed knee surgeries in the younger population. The success of this procedure largely depends on the proper formation of the tunnel, which is obtained by drilling the tibia and which serves to position and fix the graft. Methods. The study was performed on a group of 15 patients in whom the developed software applied the measurement of the angle of the tunnel in the tibia based on the selection of characteristic points on two standard X-rays of the knee (anterior-posterior and lateral projection). The obtained results were compared with the results of measuring the angle of the tunnel in the tibia on knee images by computed tomography (CT) in all patients. Results. The drilling angle measured in CT scans is on average somewhat greater 59.07 ? 5.61? than the angle measured by applying a developed application 58.65 ? 5.89?. The obtained results indicate minimal differences without statistical significance in the measurements of the angle of the tunnel in the tibia using the developed software and on CT images (Wilcoxon test: Z= -1.363; p=0.173). Conclusion. The analysis of the obtained results concludes that the presented method and developed software are suitable for everyday clinical application from the population of precision and usability and can be used to assess the position of tunnels in the tibia in the process of determining the success of surgery or in preparing patients for revision surgery.

show abstract

Balance Assessment during the Landing Phase of Jump-Down in Healthy Men and Male Patients after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Abstract: The aim of the study was to evaluate balance during the landing phase in a control group and patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR

Cited by 3 publications

References 37 publications

Kinetic measurement system use in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review of methodological approaches

Kinetic measurement system use in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review of methodological approaches

Movement Tracking in Augmented and Mixed Realities Impacting the User Activity in Medicine and Healthcare

Determination of spatial position of tibial graft using X-ray images after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About