2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/humanoids.2016.7803247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balance control using center of mass height variation: Limitations imposed by unilateral contact

Abstract: Maintaining balance is fundamental to legged robots. The most commonly used mechanisms for balance control are taking a step, regulating the center of pressure ('ankle strategies'), and to a lesser extent, changing centroidal angular momentum (e.g., 'hip strategies'). In this paper, we disregard these three mechanisms, instead focusing on a fourth: varying center of mass height. We study a 2D variableheight center of mass model, and analyze how center of mass height variation can be used to achieve balance, in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also works performing capturability analysis for the more complex variable-height inverted pendulum (VHIP) model to account for the height changes of the CoM. [29][30][31] address the balance control of humanoid robot using VHIP model for planar motions. [32] further extends it to consider 3D movements, and develops an analytical tool to determine capturability in the VHIP model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also works performing capturability analysis for the more complex variable-height inverted pendulum (VHIP) model to account for the height changes of the CoM. [29][30][31] address the balance control of humanoid robot using VHIP model for planar motions. [32] further extends it to consider 3D movements, and develops an analytical tool to determine capturability in the VHIP model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach uses semi-definite programming to identify the limits of safety in the state space of a system as well as associated controllers for a broad class of nonlinear [5], [6], [7] and hybrid systems [8], [9]. These safe sets can take the form of reachable sets (sets that can reach a known safe state) [10], [9], [5] or invariant sets (sets whose members can be controlled to remain in the set indefinitely) in state space [11], [8], [12]. However, the representation of each of these sets in state space severely restricts the size of the problem that can be tackled by these approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we enforce the physical constraint that the variation in height satisfy |z cm −z cm | ≤ z max , defining a corresponding unsafe region. As with the LIPM, this is a zero impact model, and so the reset dynamics remain unchanged from (15), with the addition that z cm+ = z cm− andż cm+ =ż cm− . Fig.…”
Section: B Variable Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 illustrates a slice of the the viable capture-regions for this model, where z cm =z cm andż cm = 0, demonstrating the marginal improvement in control authority gained by this additional control authority. Koolen et al [15] also analyzed a variable height model, for balancing only, although there are a few key differences between that work and this. The approach there was able to exactly calculate the 0-step viablecapture basin, without approximation.…”
Section: B Variable Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation