2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18615-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balanced Walking with Capture Steps

Abstract: Abstract. Bipedal walking is one of the most essential skills required to play soccer with humanoid robots. Superior walking speed and stability often gives teams the winning edge when their robots are the first at the ball, maintain ball control, and drive the ball towards the opponent goal with sure feet. In this contribution, we present an implementation of our Capture Step Framework on a real soccer robot, and show robust omnidirectional walking. The robot not only manages to locomote on an even surface, b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In earlier work, we evaluated the same capture step controller with our robot Dynaped [Missura and Behnke, 2015b]. The video f shows reliable and controllable walking skills with strong disturbance rejection capabilities.…”
Section: Dynaped Videosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In earlier work, we evaluated the same capture step controller with our robot Dynaped [Missura and Behnke, 2015b]. The video f shows reliable and controllable walking skills with strong disturbance rejection capabilities.…”
Section: Dynaped Videosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. The step timing is computed using the capture step framework [13], based on the lateral CoM state [14].…”
Section: Bipedal Walkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Linear Inverted Pendulum [13] and the Capture Point [14] models represent two widespread simplified robot models. These simplified linear models have allowed on-line RHC, also providing references for the footstep locations [15], [16], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently from [10], we do not fix the robot velocity. Compared to [15], [16], [17], we do not assume the robot to be always in single support. As a consequence, the robot avoids to step in place continuously if the desired robot position does not change, or changes slowly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%