2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2021.105674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing and scheduling assembly lines with human-robot collaboration tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost function aims at reducing the total makespan, and the solution is obtained with a constraint programming model and the use of a Genetic Algorithm (GA). In [23], instead, the authors propose the use of a Simulated Annealing (SA) algorithm to find the optimal solution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost function aims at reducing the total makespan, and the solution is obtained with a constraint programming model and the use of a Genetic Algorithm (GA). In [23], instead, the authors propose the use of a Simulated Annealing (SA) algorithm to find the optimal solution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Therefore, parameters of the MRGGA algorithm are carefully determined after conducting the Taguchi method. Details of the Taguchi method and its step by step process can be found in Nourmohammadi et al 40 Table 2 demonstrates the considered levels for each parameter, and Figure 12 shows the obtained signal-to-noise (SN) ratios by performing the Taguchi method. As a result of the conducted experiments, the decided values for the parameters in this research are 0.7 for cross_rate, 0.3 for mut_rate, 100 for popsize, 10 for Num_Good and Num_Bad, and 20 for ter_num.…”
Section: Parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results also show that MRGGA requires more CPU time than RGGA. To further evaluate the performance of the MRGGA as compared to RGGA, two indices of relative improvement percentage (RIP) and RIP per second Process time U [40,60] Distances U [40,60] Vehicle transportation speed U [1,3] Supplier production speed U [1,3] Occupied space by orders U [20,60] Vehicle capacity U [5,20] Quality of production U [1,5] Energy consumption by suppliers U [1,5] Fuel…”
Section: Comparison With Rggamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate a significant increase in the productivity of the assembly area. One of the reasons the authors cite the ability to allocate human and robotic resources in real time for the work plan execution [9]. Also, collaborative works can support the execution of tasks by a person at low costs [1], thus ensuring the profitability of partial automation of the assembly process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%