2016
DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2016.1226815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing justice goals: restorative justice practitioners’ views

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study contributes to a growing literature which examines how restorative justice is understood and experienced by its facilitators (e.g., Crocker, 2016;Murray, 2012). Researchers caution that police anecdotes may reflect mythology, rather than reality (Bayley & Bittner, 1984), but officers' accounts can boost our understanding of the principles, reasoning and priorities that underpin their decision-making (Reiner, 2010;Shearing & Ericson, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This study contributes to a growing literature which examines how restorative justice is understood and experienced by its facilitators (e.g., Crocker, 2016;Murray, 2012). Researchers caution that police anecdotes may reflect mythology, rather than reality (Bayley & Bittner, 1984), but officers' accounts can boost our understanding of the principles, reasoning and priorities that underpin their decision-making (Reiner, 2010;Shearing & Ericson, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(2) strengthen communities; (3) increase victim satisfaction; and (4) restore public confidence in the criminal justice system (Crocker, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The province of Nova Scotia is also leading many other RJ initiatives particularly in the education, research, capacity building, and human rights spheres. Published articles and reports on the impact of RJ practices in Nova Scotia are extensive (Archibald & Llewellyn, 2006;Clairmont, 2005;Clairmont & Waters, 2015;Crocker, 2016;Llewellyn et al, 2015). There is a dearth, however, of peer-reviewed journal articles documenting perspectives of visionaries and practitioners of RJ, since most of the scholarship has focused exclusively on the voices of victims and offenders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers to implementation often manifest in traditional ways of thinking that are linked to the principles of the formal criminal justice system which promotes punishment, retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and accountability, compared to RJ that promotes victim, offender, and community participation. The differences between the traditional justice system and restorative justice has raised questions and concerns regarding the ability of criminal justice practitioners (particularly police) to balance the competing goals of RJ and the traditional criminal justice system (Crocker, 2016). However, it appears that frontline officers generally view restorative justice as a viable option for both youth and adult offenders (Crocker, 2013;Stockdale, 2015), while earlier studies have found that police often did not have a clear understanding of RJ philosophies, and viewed it as appropriate for first time, less serious, non-violent offenders (Abramson, 2003).…”
Section: Restorative Justice and Policementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With on-going training, police officers can balance the competing goals of restorative justice and criminal justice (McCold, 2003). This leaves some researchers to conclude that the argument against police-led restorative justice programs are not possible should be laid to rest (Crocker, 2016;McCold, 2003). When trying to implement new policies into police organizations, agencies must be cognizant not to revert to a "business as usual" mentality.…”
Section: Issues With Policy Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%