2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing research, monitoring, and action to recover Canada’s species at risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Avoiding investing time and resources in reducing those sources of uncertainty that are unimportant, uncontrollable, or of limited relevance to management is therefore an important task for managers. For example, half of all management actions proposed for species at risk in Canada are related to research and monitoring, with this percentage highest for the most threatened species (Buxton et al 2022). An important task for managers is therefore to identify which decisions will have beneficial and cost effective outcomes for the species in the face of the existing uncertainties (Milner‐Gulland and Shea 2017, Stevens et al 2017, Noel et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avoiding investing time and resources in reducing those sources of uncertainty that are unimportant, uncontrollable, or of limited relevance to management is therefore an important task for managers. For example, half of all management actions proposed for species at risk in Canada are related to research and monitoring, with this percentage highest for the most threatened species (Buxton et al 2022). An important task for managers is therefore to identify which decisions will have beneficial and cost effective outcomes for the species in the face of the existing uncertainties (Milner‐Gulland and Shea 2017, Stevens et al 2017, Noel et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part C of the methodology describes a process for testing the correlation between predetermined "explanatory" variables and recoveryaction interactions, thus enabling the identification of factors that may be predictive of interaction types. Our application of the db-RDA builds upon a body of literature critiquing the SARA process (e.g., Bolliger et al, 2020;Buxton et al, 2022;Pawluk et al, 2019;Turcotte et al, 2021), including a paper that used similar statistical methods to test the relationship between threats to species and the ambition of recovery strategies (McCune et al, 2013). The use of db-RDA helped to corroborate ecological hypotheses regarding broad causes of recovery-action interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al hacer un análisis nacional del Índice de Especies en Riesgo, se observa que dichas especies estaban concentradas en Chihuahua, Tamaulipas y Veracruz, por lo que es recomendable promover el manejo de un mayor número de especies en riesgo en el resto de las entidades federativas. Buxton et al (2022) señalan que existe menos información biológica y ecológica de las especies con mayor riesgo de extinción, lo cual limita el manejo de dichas especies al interior de las UMA. Por su parte, Ortega y Contreras (2013) coinciden en que una de las limitantes actuales de los programas gubernamentales en materia de conservación de especies en riesgo es que la información que se genera no se divulga.…”
Section: Análisis De La Conservación Biológica En Las Umaunclassified