2010
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing Risk and Innovation to Improve Social Work Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
49
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the macro-context, James, Unwin and Guille (2013, 246) 12 highlight the importance of knowledge, innovation and creativity for survival in the current competitive reality. Brown (2010) concurs and adds that many countries worldwide seem to be turning to innovation as a strategy for growth. The challenge posed for education researchers is to engage in the problem of how to enable learning for innovation (Editorial 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the macro-context, James, Unwin and Guille (2013, 246) 12 highlight the importance of knowledge, innovation and creativity for survival in the current competitive reality. Brown (2010) concurs and adds that many countries worldwide seem to be turning to innovation as a strategy for growth. The challenge posed for education researchers is to engage in the problem of how to enable learning for innovation (Editorial 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Innovations have the potential to improve quality and delivery of social services, though risk taking is inherent in their implementation (Brown, 2010). Innovation in the social sphere means accomplishing more with less, working together, leveraging resources, sharing data and creating models for change that are sustainable.…”
Section: Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown (2010) and Cohen (1999) identified challenges to innovation: resistance to change and managers feeling threatened by change ideas, high turnover of staff, challenges in implementation with high staff turnover, lack of incentives and regulatory frameworks that inhibit socially innovative ideas, belief that all change can originate at the top only, and finally the risk and vulnerability of the service users may make it difficult for service providers to try new ideas. Nonetheless, involving employees in designing and implementing socially innovative ideas not only improves practice but also can be motivating and empowering for employees (Cohen, 1999).…”
Section: Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clients do not want to be over protected and, within limits, want to be involved in judging and taking risks for themselves (Bornat and Bytheway, 2010;DoH, 2007;Taylor and Donnelly, 2006a). In seeking proper regulation, we must avoid stifling innovation in service development and creativity in supporting clients (Brown, 2010). The service is built upon trusting IJLPS 7,4 relationship between clients and professionals, and frameworks for risk management need to take cognisance of this (Scrivens, 2005).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%