2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-014-9422-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing the current account: experimental evidence on underconsumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be formalized in a level‐k$k$ model that provides a parsimonious specification for the inertia of price setters. It fits well to an experiment with full information and a high coordination motive (Shapiro, Shi, and Zillante 2014, Bosworth 2017) and can explain disequilibrium behavior quite well (Giamattei and Lambsdorff 2015). In addition, it is tractable and often applied in macroeconomic models (Angeletos and Lian 2018, Iovino and Sergeyev 2018, Garcia‐Schmidt and Woodford 2019).…”
Section: Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This can be formalized in a level‐k$k$ model that provides a parsimonious specification for the inertia of price setters. It fits well to an experiment with full information and a high coordination motive (Shapiro, Shi, and Zillante 2014, Bosworth 2017) and can explain disequilibrium behavior quite well (Giamattei and Lambsdorff 2015). In addition, it is tractable and often applied in macroeconomic models (Angeletos and Lian 2018, Iovino and Sergeyev 2018, Garcia‐Schmidt and Woodford 2019).…”
Section: Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Subjects choose the business indicator as a simple heuristic instead of the equilibrium (20+ /2). In another macroeconomic application, Giamattei and Lambsdorff (2015) use the beauty contest with a known constant as a model of the Keynesian multiplier where is a non-stationary series of exogenous investments. Subjects have to choose individually optimal consumption as 4/5*income, where 4/5 is the marginal propensity to consume.…”
Section: Related Macroeconomic Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%