1997
DOI: 10.1093/jrma/122.1.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ballads and Britons: Imagined Community and the Continuity of ‘English’ Opera

Abstract: Joseph Addison's Spectator is perhaps the best-known early eighteenth-century periodical, its title a byword for the period's acute critical sensibility, its pages of enthusiastic enquiry a fitting monument to what we like to call the ‘Age of Reason’. Of the many commentaries on opera included in its pages, Spectator no. 5 (6 March 1711), critiquing the inadequacy of attempts at scenic verisimilitude on London's operatic stage, is justly renowned. Addison's tale of the undesirable (and wholly unmusical) result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps one of the finest works on the subject is by Suzanne Aspden, who provides a well‐argued account of early English ballads, opera and theatre in the eighteenth century. Aspden is also sensitive to continuity between eighteenth‐century operatic work and earlier iterations of popular music, and engages eruditely with the overlap between popular history, popular music and theatre in the eighteenth century. However, she does not demonstrate that any one specific work had extensive geographical or cultural reach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps one of the finest works on the subject is by Suzanne Aspden, who provides a well‐argued account of early English ballads, opera and theatre in the eighteenth century. Aspden is also sensitive to continuity between eighteenth‐century operatic work and earlier iterations of popular music, and engages eruditely with the overlap between popular history, popular music and theatre in the eighteenth century. However, she does not demonstrate that any one specific work had extensive geographical or cultural reach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%