1971
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4361(71)90152-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ballistic impact resistance of carbon-fibre laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observation has been made in Ref. [31,32], with a little bit higher deflection of the composites as reported in Ref. [33].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar observation has been made in Ref. [31,32], with a little bit higher deflection of the composites as reported in Ref. [33].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, this phenomenon totally coincides with the observed properties. Thus, Rodgers et al [40] showed that despite the fact the composites reinforced with modified carbon fibers needed higher kinetic energy to cause any significant damage during ballistic tests, once this limit energy was reached, composites were destructed in a brittle manner, consequently absorbing much less energy compared with composites reinforced It was shown that the composites reinforced with initial fibers have an impact strength of 155 kJ/m 2 for composites with 70 wt.% of fiber content and 130 kJ/m 2 for 50 wt.% compared with 86 kJ/m 2 and 80 kJ/m 2 of the composites reinforced with modified fibers TO300 and TO500, respectively. Such behavior can be interpreted as abnormal, considering the better mechanical properties and fracture toughness of CFRP reinforced with treated CFs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, this phenomenon totally coincides with the observed properties. Thus, Rodgers et al [ 40 ] showed that despite the fact the composites reinforced with modified carbon fibers needed higher kinetic energy to cause any significant damage during ballistic tests, once this limit energy was reached, composites were destructed in a brittle manner, consequently absorbing much less energy compared with composites reinforced with initial fibers. The same results were presented in several studies where an inverse dependence between interfacial bonding strength and impact properties of CFRPs based on thermoset [ 41 ] and thermoplastic [ 30 , 31 ] polymers was found.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these early impact investigations provided an insight into the various properties of composites, many authors [9][10][11][12][13] were having reservations as to whether Izod and Charpy impact tests were actually providing useful experimental data for the design of composite structures. This was because the test specimen geometries were unrepresentative of structural applications and therefore their validity for composite component design was unreliable.…”
Section: Early Impact Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1971, Rogers et al [9] used an air-gun to conduct high speed ballistic impact tests on square composite laminates, to determine if impact resistance could be improved by treating the fibre surface with sodium hypochlorite. The authors state that the air-gun proved to be a suitable experimental apparatus for the study of small particle impact on composite materials.…”
Section: Early Impact Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%