2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ballistic resistance of high hardness armor steels against 7.62mm armor piercing ammunition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing the reaction of a material to high velocity impact includes considering the effects of deformation, strain rate and temperature. Therefore, the Johnson-Cook (J-C) elastic-plastic model was adopted for mathematical description, including the rheological properties of materials [44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the reaction of a material to high velocity impact includes considering the effects of deformation, strain rate and temperature. Therefore, the Johnson-Cook (J-C) elastic-plastic model was adopted for mathematical description, including the rheological properties of materials [44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is not possible to make correct specimens from the bullet due to machining difficulties. Borvik et al [9], Kilic et al [11] and Buchar et al [29] have reported some JC material constants for hard core projectile made of 1007 tool steel with 800 HV hardness which is designed for 7.62 mm NATO ball. Hardness investigation on the N12E hard steel core gave a value of 720 HV which was considered comparable to the 1007 steel core.…”
Section: Bullet Projectilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardness investigation on the N12E hard steel core gave a value of 720 HV which was considered comparable to the 1007 steel core. Preliminary ballistics simulation studies with Ls-Dyna have shown that Kilic et al [11] and Buchar et al [29] material parameters (see Table 3) result in large plastic deformation on the bullet core after interaction with the armour plate, and the projectile residual velocity is underestimated. Borvik et al [9] has modelled 7.62 AP bullet steel core as a rigid material.…”
Section: Bullet Projectilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constitutive Johnson-Cook model (J-C) was used to describe the material of the shield and the projectile. This model correctly represents the behavior of the material under conditions of high rate of deformation in the elastic-plastic range, with the reinforcement of the material and thermal weakening taken into consideration (Hanzell, 2016 andKılıc et al, 2013). In numerical calculations, the following material constants were assumed based on the authors' earlier works (Kurzawa et al, 2017B and (Table 2).…”
Section: Model and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%