Balloon-assisted sacroplasty as a successful procedure for osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures after failure of the conservative treatment

Radmer²,

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

et al. 2022

Background Fragility fractures of the sacrum (FFS) have been detected more and more frequently in recent times, and the incidence will continue to increase due to increasing life expectancy. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of conservative, interventional and surgical treatment of FFS. Methods Retrospectively, 292 patients (276 women, 16 men) with confirmed FFS were followed up over a period of 2 years. The age of the women was Ø 81.2 (58 - 99) and that of the men Ø 78.1 (76 - 85) years. The pain was quantified using a VAS. Fractures were classified in accordance with the Rommens and Hofmann and with the Denis classification using conventional X-rays, CT and MRI. A QCT of the lumbar spine was performed to quantify bone mineral density. Concomitant diseases of every patient were recorded. An interdisciplinary case conference determined the individual treatment concept considering the age, type of fracture, pain level and comorbidities with classification into conservative, interventional (any type of sacroplasty) or surgical treatment. Over the course pain and independence were measured, complications and patient satisfaction were documented. A vitamin D determination was done, and existing comorbidities were included. Results Patients with a pain level of ≤5 benefited from the conservative therapy measures, with pain levels > 5 significantly delaying the development of mobility. After sacroplasty, the pain reduced significantly, which caused a rapid improvement in mobility without any significant difference being found between vertebro- (VSP), balloon (BSP), radiofrequency (RFS) and cement sacroplasty (CSP). In terms of pain reduction and mobilization, the surgical treated patients benefited from osteosynthesis, although more complex fracture types with lumbopelvic stabilization took longer. Overall, there were no deaths during the hospital stay. Mortality after 12 months was 21.7% for the conservative, 8.4% for the interventional and 13.6% for the surgical therapy group; the differences are significant. For patients in the conservative therapy group who were difficult to mobilize due to pain, the mortality increased to 24.3%. Over 24 months, patients achieved the best independence after sacroplasty. At 12 and 24 months, subjective satisfaction with the therapies was best after sacroplasty, followed by osteosynthesis and conservative measures. All patients had a pronounced vitamin D deficiency and manifest osteoporosis. Cardiovascular pathologies were the main concomitant diseases. Conclusions Patients with FFS with a low level of pain benefit from conservative therapy measures, whereby complications and mortality increase significantly in the case of persistent immobilizing pain. Patients with an unacceptable level of pain resulting from non-dislocated fractures benefit significantly from sacroplasty. Patients with unstable and displaced fractures (Rommens and Hofmann type III and IV) should be operated on promptly. Different techniques are available for sacroplasty and osteosynthesis, which lead to an improvement of independence and a reduction in mortality.

Section: Interventionalsupporting

confidence: 58%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Comparative outcome of different treatment options for fragility fractures of the sacrum

Radmer²,

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

et al. 2022

“…This has been found by many studies [26, 34, 42, 46 -52] and is supported by comparable results from multicentre studies [53,54], systematic reviews and meta-analyses [8, 55 -59]. Schwetje et al [51] were also able to show a signi cant increase in mobility after BSP in the absence of an effect under conservative therapy.…”

Section: Interventionalsupporting

confidence: 56%

Comparative outcome of different treatment options for fragility fractures of the sacrum

Radmer²,

et al. 2022

Preprint

Background: Fragility fractures of the sacrum (FFS) have been detected more and more frequently in recent times, and the incidence will continue to increase due to increasing life expectancy. The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility and clinical outcome of conservative, interventional and surgical treatment of FFS.Methods: Retrospectively, 292 patients (276 women, 16 men) with confirmed FFS were followed up over a period of 5 years. The age of the women was Ø 81.2 (58 - 99) and that of the men Ø 78.1 (76 - 85) years. The pain was quantified using a VAS. A fracture classification was carried out considering X-rays, CT and MRI examinations. A QCT of the lumbar spine was performed to quantify bone mineral density. Fractures were recorded, taking X-rays and medical history into account. An interdisciplinary case conference determined the individual treatment concept with classification into conservative, interventional or surgical treatment. Over the course pain and independence was measured, complications and patient satisfaction were documented. A vitamin D determination was done, and existing comorbidities were included.Results: Patients with a pain level of ≤ 5 benefited from the conservative therapy measures, with pain levels > 5 significantly delaying the development of mobility. After sacroplasty, the pain reduced significantly, which caused a rapid improvement in mobility without any significant difference being found between vertebro- (VSP), balloon (BSP), radiofrequency (RFS) and cement sacroplasty (CSP). The planned osteosynthesis was carried out as planned. In terms of pain reduction and mobilization, the patients benefited from osteosynthesis, although more complex fracture types with lumbopelvic stabilization took longer. Overall, there were no deaths during the hospital stay. Mortality after 12 months was 21.7% for the conservative, 8.4% for the interventional and 13.6% for the surgical therapy group; the differences are significant. For patients in the conservative therapy group who were difficult to mobilize due to pain, the mortality increased to 24.3%. Over 24 months, patients achieved the best independence after sacroplasty. At 12 and 24 months, subjective satisfaction with the therapies was best after sacroplasty, followed by osteosynthesis and conservative measures. All patients had a pronounced vitamin D deficiency and manifest osteoporosis. Cardiovascular pathologies were the main concomitant diseases.Conclusions: Patients with FFS with a low level of pain benefit from conservative therapy measures, whereby complications and mortality increase significantly in the case of persistent immobilizing pain. Patients with an unacceptable level of pain resulting from non-dislocated fractures benefit significantly from sacroplasty. Patients with unstable and displaced fractures should be operated on promptly. Different techniques are available for sacroplasty and osteosynthesis, which lead to an improvement of independence and a reduction in mortality.

Contemporary Diagnostic Radiology

“…Particular attention is paid to not violate the anterior cortex. With both short-axis and long-axis, kyphoplasty balloons may also be used 20…”

Section: Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is Nothing Sacrum? Identification and Treatment of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures

Monsma,

Le,

Brooks

et al. 2023

Sacral insufficiency fractures are an overlooked etiology of back pain that can also be difficult to diagnose radiographically. Advanced imaging, including MR and scintigraphy, are useful modalities for diagnosis, as these fractures are frequently missed on plain films. Management is often conservative to avoid surgical fixation, a rarely performed surgery due to its high morbidity. Radiologists are also able to provide symptomatic relief via sacroplasty, a minimally invasive, percutaneous, image-guided procedure first described in 2002. The most common sites of pelvic insufficiency fractures include the sacral ala and parasymphyseal region of the os pubis. The butterfly or “H-shaped” pattern is a classic sign of this fracture on scintigraphy, best appreciated posteriorly. MR is considered the gold standard in diagnosing insufficiency fractures and is characterized by low T1 band-like signal intensity with corresponding high T2/T2 short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) signal intensity. Such fractures can be treated via sacroplasty by carefully injecting polymethylmethacrylate bone cement via one or more trocar needles. Knowledge of sacral anatomy is critical during the procedure to not violate specific sacral zones or traverse any of the neural foramina.