1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00053847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balloon-borne measurements of NO2: can a comparison of remote techniques be made from the historic data?

Abstract: When all balloon-borne measurements of NO z in the stratosphere are reviewed, the profiles show a wide spread. Measurements of the total amount in a vertical column suggest that variability should be low when only profiles measured at mid-latitudes close to equinox are selected. With this selection, the standard deviation of the profiles measured by each technique is often less than + 20%, but the mean profiles measured by each technique differ by up to a factor 2. Despite the profiles not being measured simul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is considerably less than the variability shown in Figure 4 and therefore gives some confidence that the largest component in our estimates of the variability of other species is indeed due to real stratospheric variations. Notice that in recent balloon flights the variation of measured NO2 summarized by Roscoe (1987) is around 50% in the middle and upper stratosphere and is somewhat higher for NO. Figure 5 shows the mean profile and standard deviation of derived atomic oxygen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is considerably less than the variability shown in Figure 4 and therefore gives some confidence that the largest component in our estimates of the variability of other species is indeed due to real stratospheric variations. Notice that in recent balloon flights the variation of measured NO2 summarized by Roscoe (1987) is around 50% in the middle and upper stratosphere and is somewhat higher for NO. Figure 5 shows the mean profile and standard deviation of derived atomic oxygen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next question that should be addressed is: given the constraints on the data (times, locations and accuracy) is a valid comparison possible? Roscoe (1986) argues that instrument differences as large as those seen in NO2 measurements (factors of two) were obvious even from nonsimultaneous measurements. However, if differences less than 10-20% are sought then simultaneity becomes more important, as will be discussed below.…”
Section: Discussion Of Sampling Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore differences in the absorption parameters for NO 2 may account for any apparent discrepancies between those two data sets. NO 2 measurements made in the visible spectral region typically give larger amounts than those made in the infrared [Roscoe, 1986]. At least part of this discrepancy is because room temperature cross sections have historically been used for the visible region.…”
Section: Regression Lines Comparing Lauder Columns (Above 15 Km) Withmentioning
confidence: 99%