Aims
We aimed to assess whether the level of aortic root calcification is associated with BAV performance/omission during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and to explore related outcomes.
Methods and results
EASE‐IT TF was a prospective, observational, multicenter registry of patients undergoing TF‐TAVI with the Edwards SAPIEN 3, with or without BAV predilation. Valvular calcification was quantified from pre‐procedural multi‐slice computed tomography images and compared between BAV and no BAV patients. Data for 178 patients (55 BAV; 123 no BAV) were analyzed. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of regional/leaflet sector calcification volumes, maximum asymmetry between the different leaflet sectors, or total calcification scores. Overall, a greater‐than‐average leaflet calcification volume was independently predictive of ≥mild PVL (OR: 5.116; 95% CI: 1.042–38.35) and the need for post‐dilation (OR: 3.592; 95% CI: 1.173–12.14). The latter effect was abated in patients with BAV (OR: 1.837; 95% CI: 0.223–18.00) and intensified in those without BAV (OR: 5.575; 95% CI: 1.114–38.74). No other BAV‐dependent effects of calcification on outcomes were observed.
Conclusions
In the majority of transfemoral valve implantations, calcification does not appear to be the main driving factor in the decision to perform/omit BAV. Predilation may be valuable for reducing post‐dilation requirements in patients only with a greater degree of leaflet calcification.