2022
DOI: 10.1002/pul2.12115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension previously operated by pulmonary endarterectomy

Abstract: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty improved hemodynamics, walking distance, and World Health Organization functional class in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension not eligible for pulmonary endarterectomy (Non-PEA) and patients with persistent pulmonary hypertension after PEA (PEA). More mild complications were observed in PEA-compared to Non-PEA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primarily, the overall prevalence of peri-procedural complications in our study was 14% and 9% for thoracic complications, none of them were severe. The overall complication rate is comparable to the percentages described in other studies, with a range from 11% to 17% 15,24,25,26 . However, in a recent Japanese study by Ito et al 14 , complications were reported in up to 25% of the BPA treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Primarily, the overall prevalence of peri-procedural complications in our study was 14% and 9% for thoracic complications, none of them were severe. The overall complication rate is comparable to the percentages described in other studies, with a range from 11% to 17% 15,24,25,26 . However, in a recent Japanese study by Ito et al 14 , complications were reported in up to 25% of the BPA treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Here, we analyzed mostly inoperable CTEPH patients, in contrast to the Japanese study in which 46% underwent PEA prior to BPA 14 . Previous PEA, and the distinctive thromboembolic phenotype observed in Japanese patients may contribute to the elevated complication rate described by the Japanese investigators compared to the other studies 5,14,25,27,28 . So far, studies on peri-procedural (thoracic) complications were reported prior to the publication of the ESC BPA consensus paper, describing the definition of BPA related complications in detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“… 9 , 11 , 49 However, less hemodynamic improvement than that in primary BPA occurred. 49 Polish authors describe very hard occlusions after PEA, challenging to dilate, 11 potentially resulting in hemoptysis, 50 requiring embolization. 51 …”
Section: Patient Selection and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports on BPA after PEA are sparse and the results are conflicting. Improvements in hemodynamics and functional capacity have been reported in 42 patients included in three studies, 28–30 while a UK report observed more non‐responders with BPA after PEA than with BPA in PEA‐naïve CTEPH patients 31 . Whether these differences can be explained by more aggressive protocols and differences in the number of BPA sessions is uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%