2020
DOI: 10.1177/1532673x20943559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ballot Cues, Business Candidates, and Voter Choices in Local Elections

Abstract: American voters commonly express abstract support for candidates with a business background, yet there is minimal systematic evidence about whether it advantages candidates in actual electoral contests. We examine this question using observational data, drawing on a California law allowing candidates to designate their occupational background on the ballot, and experimental data. Candidates with a business background are prevalent in California. However, neither of our studies indicate that business candidates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our priors and experimental research on working class and business candidates in other contexts (Adams et al, 2021;Carnes, 2018;Carnes and Lupu, 2016a), Figure B.3a shows that voters prefer candidates that work as an employee (over a business owner) in companies that have followed government's regulations, which gives an indication for whom they may hold accountable in the corruption case. Note: These plots show the marginal means (MMs), i.e.…”
Section: Interaction Effects: Voter Supportsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In line with our priors and experimental research on working class and business candidates in other contexts (Adams et al, 2021;Carnes, 2018;Carnes and Lupu, 2016a), Figure B.3a shows that voters prefer candidates that work as an employee (over a business owner) in companies that have followed government's regulations, which gives an indication for whom they may hold accountable in the corruption case. Note: These plots show the marginal means (MMs), i.e.…”
Section: Interaction Effects: Voter Supportsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, the voter bias hypothesis has not found clear support in modern empirical research. Across countries as varied as Argentina, Austria, Canada, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and across a range of measures of economic backgrounds, both observational and experimental studies fail to find evidence that voters prefer politicians from more privileged economic backgrounds (Adams et al 2020, Albaugh 2020, Bonica 2020, Campbell & Cowley 2014, Carnes 2018, Carnes & Lupu 2016a, Gift & Lastra-Anadón 2018, Griffin et al 2019, Horiuchi et al 2018, Hoyt & DeShields 2020, Kevins 2021, Sevi et al 2020, Vivyan et al 2020). On the contrary, researchers more often find that voters see less advantaged candidates as warmer and more relatable, and voters consistently report that they would prefer to see more working-class politicians in office (Carnes & Lupu 2022b).…”
Section: The Causes Of Representational Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when it came to small businessmen candidates these partisan differences didn't occur. [18] American voters were not the only voters who seemed to be important to public opinion scholars. Scholars studied the inclinations of British voters in an attempt to clarify their stance regarding rich candidates.…”
Section: The Public Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%