2014
DOI: 10.3390/rs61212360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BAMS: A Tool for Supervised Burned Area Mapping Using Landsat Data

Abstract: Abstract:A new supervised burned area mapping software named BAMS (Burned Area Mapping Software) is presented in this paper. The tool was built from standard ArcGIS TM libraries. It computes several of the spectral indexes most commonly used in burned area detection and implements a two-phase supervised strategy to map areas burned between two Landsat multitemporal images. The only input required from the user is the visual delimitation of a few burned areas, from which burned perimeters are extracted. After t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
86
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4. Flowchart of the fire data processing from (i) the raw data on burn date (BD) and Quality Assessment (QA) for the MODIS MCD45A1 and ESA FIRE_CCI pixel level fire products, the LANDSAT images and their processing into fire patches with the ABAMS software [30] as previously performed for this study site [20], (ii) the flood fill algorithm allowing pixel aggregation into patches identification (ID) according to their burn date, (iii) the crosstabulation of fire patches between fire products, the selection of patches overlapping over more than 30% of their surface, (iv) the calculation of patch morphological metrics and (v) the final correlation analysis using a linear regression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4. Flowchart of the fire data processing from (i) the raw data on burn date (BD) and Quality Assessment (QA) for the MODIS MCD45A1 and ESA FIRE_CCI pixel level fire products, the LANDSAT images and their processing into fire patches with the ABAMS software [30] as previously performed for this study site [20], (ii) the flood fill algorithm allowing pixel aggregation into patches identification (ID) according to their burn date, (iii) the crosstabulation of fire patches between fire products, the selection of patches overlapping over more than 30% of their surface, (iv) the calculation of patch morphological metrics and (v) the final correlation analysis using a linear regression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fire perimeters from LANDSAT were derived from a semi-automatic algorithm (ABAMS) [30], following a standard protocol defined for the ESA FIRE_CCI project [31], based on the CEOS-Land Product Validation guidelines [32] and used for previous global burned area products' validation [33]. Burned area perimeters were verified by a systematic quality control through visual Remote Sens.…”
Section: Burned Area Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this validation effort, however, errors of commission exceeded errors of omission in all four ecoregions. The difference in error distribution can be potentially attributed to: (1) region-growing functions included in generating both the BAECV [10] and Landsat reference dataset (using the program Burned Area Mapping Software (BAMS)) [73]; and (2) an intrinsic ability to map more fire heterogeneity as the spatial resolution of the input imagery becomes finer. A potential source of this increased patchiness or fire heterogeneity mapped by the high-resolution imagery (e.g., Figure 4) could have been live crowns mapped incorrectly as unburned in areas with surface burns, which would have incorrectly elevated errors of commission for the BAECV; however, much of the increased heterogeneity can be attributed to the high-resolution images correctly mapping bare soil, rock and unburned patches of vegetation within the burn perimeter as unburned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When burned area algorithms are optimized for site level performance, the accuracy can exceed 95% [29,72]. As the target area expands, accuracy often begins to decrease (e.g., 15% to 30% error for burned area) due to variance imposed by local factors [33,73,74]. Disturbances (fires, clearcut and insect mortality) have been mapped with Landsat imagery across forested portions of CONUS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multispectral characteristics, spatial resolution and temporal range and frequency of the Landsat sensors make the imagery highly suitable for mapping fire scars at a regional scale [25,26]. The Global Visualization Viewer (http://glovis.usgs.gov) was used to preview the Landsat imagery and to select the best cloud-free scenes.…”
Section: Landsat Imagery Acquisition and Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%