1985
DOI: 10.1002/mana.19851230110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Banach Spaces of Distributions Defined by Decomposition Methods, I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
225
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
225
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof: By Proposition 3.1 in [21] we have to prove that any permutation π : I → I satisfying π(i) ⊂ i * for all i ∈ I induces a bounded operator on Y ♮ , i.e., (λ π(i) ) i∈I |Y ♮ ≤ C ′ (λ i ) i∈I |Y ♮ .…”
Section: Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: By Proposition 3.1 in [21] we have to prove that any permutation π : I → I satisfying π(i) ⊂ i * for all i ∈ I induces a bounded operator on Y ♮ , i.e., (λ π(i) ) i∈I |Y ♮ ≤ C ′ (λ i ) i∈I |Y ♮ .…”
Section: Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feichtinger has developed a general notion of amalgam spaces, e.g., [21,28,23,25,26]. For an introduction (with extensive references to the original literature) to the particular Wiener amalgams appearing in the following definition, we refer to [43].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above definition, instead of the family of functions (φ a ) one can use just about any bounded uniform partition of unity [21,22]. One would obtain the same space as a result [14].…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%