2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3600776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band alignment at the Cu2ZnSn(SxSe1−x)4/CdS interface

Abstract: Energy band alignments between CdS and Cu2ZnSn(SxSe1−x)4 (CZTSSe) grown via solution-based and vacuum-based deposition routes were studied as a function of the [S]/[S+Se] ratio with femtosecond laser ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy, photoluminescence, medium energy ion scattering, and secondary ion mass spectrometry. Band bending in the underlying CZTSSe layer was measured via pump/probe photovoltage shifts of the photoelectron spectra and offsets were determined with photoemission under flat band condi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
177
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
19
177
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems also that the electronic structure of a Sn-depleted surface is not favorable for the formation of well working p-n junction [74,93]. The Conduction Band Offset, about 0.4−0.5 eV, is somewhat above the optimal range of 0−0.4 eV and may contribute to lower J sc and fill factor in the CZTSSe devices [126]. Better lattice matching between absorber and buffer could limit recombination at the interface, and using different buffer with smaller lattice such as In 2 S 3 or Zn(S, O, OH) could improve the efficiency of the devices [127,128].…”
Section: Device Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems also that the electronic structure of a Sn-depleted surface is not favorable for the formation of well working p-n junction [74,93]. The Conduction Band Offset, about 0.4−0.5 eV, is somewhat above the optimal range of 0−0.4 eV and may contribute to lower J sc and fill factor in the CZTSSe devices [126]. Better lattice matching between absorber and buffer could limit recombination at the interface, and using different buffer with smaller lattice such as In 2 S 3 or Zn(S, O, OH) could improve the efficiency of the devices [127,128].…”
Section: Device Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned here that the conduction band off-set between the n-type CdS window and the CZTSSe (p-type) is significantly smaller (∆E C ∼0.4 eV) than that of the valence band off-set (∆E V ∼ 1.0 eV). 27 Almost similar type of band alignment between CdS and CIGS has also been reported. 28 Therefore, considering the above condition, during EL measurement, as the forward bias flattens the conduction band edge, electrons can easily be injected into the lower gap p-type absorber layers (both in the CZTSSe and the CIGS).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In order to determine the precipitation conditions, theoretical simulations were carrying out by HYDRA program (software for creating chemical equilibrium diagrams 4 (1) where M= Cu, Zn…”
Section: Synthesis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the CZTSSe (Cu2ZnSn(S1-x,Sex)4) is an attractive and well suited substitute to CIGS owing to sustainable (CZTS is composed of abundant and non-toxic elements) and low-cost production. Also, the CZTSSe exhibit an optimal and easily adjustable band gap that ranges between 1.1-1.5eV 4 , a large absorption coefficient (>10 4 cm -1 ) at few microns of thickness and the outgoings are lower than in CIGS (In and Ga are replaced by Zn and Sn) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%