1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.39.5572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band bending and the apparent barrier height in scanning tunneling microscopy

Abstract: We consider the influence of tip-induced band bending on the apparent barrier height deduced from scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) experiments at unpinned semiconductor surfaces.Any voltage applied to a probe tip appears partly in the vacuum gap as an electric field at the semiconductor surface and partly in the semiconductor interior as band bending. The fraction appearing in each region is a function of gap spacing so that modulation of the tip-sample separation inevitably modulates the induced surface po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rise of the band bending is nearly directly proportional to the applied voltage. 21 In this case the electric field is only screened by the charge of ionized donors. In this voltage range no tunneling of electrons from the STM tip or from the semiconductor sample is possible, because the conduction band edge at the surface is above the tip's Fermi level for positive sample voltage, and the valence-band maximum at the surface is below the Fermi level of the tip for negative sample voltage.…”
Section: A Tunneling Through a Vacuum Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rise of the band bending is nearly directly proportional to the applied voltage. 21 In this case the electric field is only screened by the charge of ionized donors. In this voltage range no tunneling of electrons from the STM tip or from the semiconductor sample is possible, because the conduction band edge at the surface is above the tip's Fermi level for positive sample voltage, and the valence-band maximum at the surface is below the Fermi level of the tip for negative sample voltage.…”
Section: A Tunneling Through a Vacuum Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a known bandbending the tunneling current can then be calculated using a tunneling theory for a MIS diode. [5][6][7][8][9][10]14,17 The question whether this quasi-equilibrium approach is valid for STS measurements is still controversly discussed. 5,10,[12][13][14] It was first recognized by Feenstra and Stroscio 5 that due to an extraction of the minority charge carriers, the semiconductor surface might not invert for the reverse bias situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, on semiconductors with a low surface state density, such as H-terminated Si, cleaved GaAs͑110͒ or the layered materials WSe 2 and WS 2 , the situation is far more complex, since the applied tunneling voltage and the work function difference between the tip and the sample lead to an additional bandbending at the semiconductor surface and nonequilibrium effects need to be considered. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In a one-dimensional model the bandbending in a metalinsulator-semiconductor ͑MIS͒ diode was first determined by Garret and Brattain 15 and Kingston and Neustadter 16 by integrating the Poisson equation, including accumulation, depletion and inversion at the semiconductor surface. For a known bandbending the tunneling current can then be calculated using a tunneling theory for a MIS diode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the tunnel currents have an exponential dependence on the tip-sample separation. 25 This accounts for the fact that under small bias conditions the current shows stronger dependence on the tip-sample separation than the one under the large bias region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%