1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.39.1457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band dispersion of an interface state: CaF2/Si(111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the orbitals hybridize to form a bonding combination, their energy is apparently reduced by -1 eV, as indicated by the position of the interface valence band in photoemission spectra. 11 One then anticipates that the corresponding antibonding states will be positioned roughly 1 eV above the Fermi level, producing a semiconducting interface with an energy separation on the order of 2 eV between the valence and conduction bands. Our experimental results yield an interface band gap of 2.4 eV.…”
Section: Exhibit the Same Resonant Features Thus Demonstrating That mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the orbitals hybridize to form a bonding combination, their energy is apparently reduced by -1 eV, as indicated by the position of the interface valence band in photoemission spectra. 11 One then anticipates that the corresponding antibonding states will be positioned roughly 1 eV above the Fermi level, producing a semiconducting interface with an energy separation on the order of 2 eV between the valence and conduction bands. Our experimental results yield an interface band gap of 2.4 eV.…”
Section: Exhibit the Same Resonant Features Thus Demonstrating That mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the measured interface valence-band dispersion and estimated conduction-band dispersion in Ref. 11, we obtain p~~0.6mo for the reduced mass, where mo represents the mass of a free electron. The observed excitonic binding energy 19 of 150 meV is then reproduced by Eq.…”
Section: For a Direct Band Gap In Two Dimensions Juosihco)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valence-band photoemission, however, does not show the interface to be metallic. 25 One possible explanation is that the interface bands are only pulled below the Fermi level in the presence of the core holes. Another is that we have an additional satellite at about 1 eV that cannot be resolved with our instrument ͑for example, due to crystalfield splitting, as discussed later͒, although this cannot account for the large inelastic tail extending ϳ25 eV ͓see Fig.…”
Section: Fig 3 Ca 2p X-ray Photoelectron Diffraction Modulations ͑A͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They associate the strong peak at about 2.4 eV to the vertical gap (HOMO-LUMO) transition at the Γ point Fig (6.3) [81,83]. It is originated by the bonding and anti-bonding matching of the Ca + (4s) and the hybridized Si(sp3) orbitals at the interface [78].…”
Section: The 1989 Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• C. The silicon presented a clean (7×7) surface reconstruction [81,82]. 6 After the first layers growth, MBE deposition can continue at lower temperature, diminishing the lattice mismatch.…”
Section: The Si(111)/caf 2 Structure 621 Experimental Samplementioning
confidence: 99%