“…In addition, a series of rare earth ions (Y 3+ , Er 3+ , Gd 3+ , Ce 3+ , or La 3+ ) doped ZnIn 2 S 4 photocatalysts was prepared by Zhu et al [83] The photocatalytic H 2 evolution performances of these prepared samples were studied, and the results showed that the H 2 evolution efficiency increased by 106%, 69%, 61%, 53%, and 46% after doping with 2.0 wt% of La 3+ , Ce 3+ , Er 3+ , Gd 3+ , and Y 3+ , respectively. In addition, some other cation doping ZnIn 2 S 4 photocatalysts have recently been reported, such as Cudoped ZnIn 2 S 4 for H 2 evolution, [71,72] Modoped ZnIn 2 S 4 for coupling of amines to imidazoles [74] and H 2 evolution, [75] Ni doped ZnIn 2 S 4 for H 2 evolution [76,78] and photoelectrochemical water splitting, [77] Fedoped ZnIn 2 S 4 for 2,4,6tribromophenol degradation, [80] Agdoped ZnIn 2 S 4 for H 2 evolution [84][85][86] Sm doped ZnIn 2 S 4 for Rhodamine B and methyl orange degra dation, [87] and Rudoped ZnIn 2 S 4 for coproduction of diesel precursors and H 2 from lignocellulosederived methylfurans. [27] Up until now, despite extensive research on the modification of ZnIn 2 S 4 photocatalyst via doping engineering, the enacted role of dopants in photocatalytic reaction remains controversial, owing to the possible existence of negative effects of dopants originating from them acting as the recombination centers for photogenerated carriers.…”