2018
DOI: 10.3390/nano8080599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band Gap Implications on Nano-TiO2 Surface Modification with Ascorbic Acid for Visible Light-Active Polypropylene Coated Photocatalyst

Abstract: The effect of surface modification using ascorbic acid as a surface modifier of nano-TiO2 heterogeneous photocatalyst was studied. The preparation of supported photocatalyst was made by a specific paste containing ascorbic acid modified TiO2 nanoparticles used to cover Polypropylene as a support material. The obtained heterogeneous photocatalyst was thoroughly characterized (scanning electron microscope (SEM), RAMAN, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), photoluminescence (PL), and D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A band gap of Eg ≈ 2.65 eV was derived from the solution by extrapolating the linear portion of the curve in Figure S1 to zero absorption. The modification of CdS NPs with Au NPs slightly reduces the Eg values, proving the photocatalytic activity [37]. The maximum of CdS NPs emission appears at 508 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A band gap of Eg ≈ 2.65 eV was derived from the solution by extrapolating the linear portion of the curve in Figure S1 to zero absorption. The modification of CdS NPs with Au NPs slightly reduces the Eg values, proving the photocatalytic activity [37]. The maximum of CdS NPs emission appears at 508 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, the ratio of anatase to rutile in mixed phase is estimated to be 83:17, which is close to Degussa P25 (80:20). The measurement of band gap is based on the method of reference [24]. The calculated E g of these samples are 3.07, 3.01, and 3.03 eV (Tauc plots of the transformed Kubelka-Munk function vs. the energy, Inset of Figure 1e) of anatase, rutile and mixed phase, respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of Anatase Rutile and Mixed Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UV/VIS DRS spectra, h-TiO 2 showed absorption of visible light, which indicates the presence of Ti(III) and Ti atoms with even lower oxidation numbers (Supporting Information 2). The optical band gap of bare TiO 2 and h-TiO 2 were determined using Kubelka-Munk method [32,33], and they are 3.2 and 3.1 eV, respectively (Supporting Information 2). However, this was not verified by the Ti 2p spectra in XPS.…”
Section: Characterizations Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%