2017
DOI: 10.3390/en10111813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band Gap Tuning of Cu2ZnGeSxSe4-x Absorbers for Thin-Film Solar Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From first principle calculations for Cu 2 ZnGeSe 4 a bandgap of 1.5 eV was calculated when replacing Sn with Ge [5], which is close to the experimentally found value of 1.52 eV [6]. For the solid solution with sulfur (Cu 2 Zn(Sn 1-x Ge x )(S,Se) 4 the bandgap can be increased even further [7]. For pure selenide (Cu 2 Zn(Sn 1-x Ge x )Se 4 ) compounds, it was shown that the bandgap increases linear for x=0-1 [8].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…From first principle calculations for Cu 2 ZnGeSe 4 a bandgap of 1.5 eV was calculated when replacing Sn with Ge [5], which is close to the experimentally found value of 1.52 eV [6]. For the solid solution with sulfur (Cu 2 Zn(Sn 1-x Ge x )(S,Se) 4 the bandgap can be increased even further [7]. For pure selenide (Cu 2 Zn(Sn 1-x Ge x )Se 4 ) compounds, it was shown that the bandgap increases linear for x=0-1 [8].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is worthwhile to mention that the calculated E U in this study is smaller than the one found for the same absorber synthesized by co-evaporation with a value of ~28 meV corresponding to E g ~1.4 eV [44]. E U of about 33 meV was encountered within the best efficiency reported for CZTGSe material with E g ~1.31 eV [41]. These values stay far below the Sn kesterite case, estimated to be around 60 meV in the case of CZTSSe, and 70 meV for CZTS [45].…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Treatment Agentcontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The V oc deficit witnesses a drop from 0.83 V for the unetched sample to 0.61 V for the sample etched with KCN with unchanged bandgap (~1.45 eV) as mentioned in Table 2. However, these values are still high compared to efficient CZTSSe and CZTGSe ones, found to be around 0.37 V and 0.35 V for a bandgap of 1.13 eV and 1.11 eV, respectively [39,40], which is expected to happen by widening the band gap [41].…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Treatment Agentmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The most obvious procedure would be to anneal the sample in the simultaneous presence of Se and S. However, the boiling point of S is 445°C [21], considerably lower than the annealing temperature of 550°C, and thereby does not allow a constant S supply during the annealing. Therefore, GeS is used as an additional sulfur source [22], which is expected to release S into the gas phase via the following reaction:…”
Section: Ge-based Compounds By Solution-based Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[S]/([S]+[Se])-ratio can be estimated based on this data, revealing that it varies in a range between 0.27 and 0.50[22]. However, the peak shape of the 112-reflections slightly changeswith the amount of GeS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%