2006
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2005.861932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band residual difference algorithm for retrieval of SO/sub 2/ from the aura ozone monitoring instrument (OMI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
273
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
273
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…scl& debug=2&geotype=st&geocode=OH&geoname= Ohio&epolmin=.&epolmax=.&epol=SO2\&sic=&netyr= 2002&geofeat=&mapsize=zsc&reqtype=getmap); typically, the reported SO 2 concentrations were nearly at the ppbv or tens of ppbv range all year around in Akron and Cleveland in recent years. Data taken from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument on the NASA EOS Aura platform (Krotkov et al, 2006) showed the average SO 2 concentration (± 1 σ ) as 0.7 ± 1.3 Dobson units (DU; 1 DU ≈1 ppbv) for the winter, 0.3 ± 0.13 DU for the spring, and 0.5 ± 0.52 DU for the fall in the planetary boundary layer in Kent, Ohio. These values were anticorrelated with the median [NH 3 ] (±1 σ ) values (60 ± 75 pptv for winter, 200 ± 120 pptv for spring, and 150 ± 80 pptv for fall), showing that when [SO 2 ] is higher, [NH 3 ] is lower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scl& debug=2&geotype=st&geocode=OH&geoname= Ohio&epolmin=.&epolmax=.&epol=SO2\&sic=&netyr= 2002&geofeat=&mapsize=zsc&reqtype=getmap); typically, the reported SO 2 concentrations were nearly at the ppbv or tens of ppbv range all year around in Akron and Cleveland in recent years. Data taken from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument on the NASA EOS Aura platform (Krotkov et al, 2006) showed the average SO 2 concentration (± 1 σ ) as 0.7 ± 1.3 Dobson units (DU; 1 DU ≈1 ppbv) for the winter, 0.3 ± 0.13 DU for the spring, and 0.5 ± 0.52 DU for the fall in the planetary boundary layer in Kent, Ohio. These values were anticorrelated with the median [NH 3 ] (±1 σ ) values (60 ± 75 pptv for winter, 200 ± 120 pptv for spring, and 150 ± 80 pptv for fall), showing that when [SO 2 ] is higher, [NH 3 ] is lower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] The OMI sensor retrieves planetary boundary layer (PBL) SO 2 column amounts from measurements of backscattered solar UV (BUV) radiation in the wavelength range of 311-315 nm using a Band Residual Difference (BRD) algorithm [Krotkov et al, 2006[Krotkov et al, , 2008. The retrieved SO 2 slant column density (SCD) (i.e., the effective total column along the mean path of BUV photons) is converted to the total SO 2 vertical column density (VCD) in Dobson Units (1 DU = 2.69 × 10 16 molecules/cm 2 ) using an air mass factor (AMF),…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first algorithm to retrieve SO 2 columns from space-borne UV measurements was developed based on a few wavelength pairs (for TOMS) and has been subsequently applied and refined for OMI measurements (e.g., Krotkov et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2007, and references therein). Current algorithms exploit back-scattered radiance measurements in a wide spectral range using a direct fitting approach Nowlan et al, 2011), a principal component analysis (PCA) method (Li et al, 2013) or (some form of) differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS; Platt and Stutz, 2008); see, e.g., Richter et al (2009), Hörmann et al (2013), or Theys et al (2015.…”
Section: Algorithm Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decades, a host of satellite-based UV-visible instruments have been used for the monitoring of anthropogenic and volcanic SO 2 emissions. Total vertical column density (VCD) of SO 2 has been retrieved with the sensors TOMS (Krueger, 1983), GOME (Eisinger and Burrows, 1998;Thomas et al, 2005;Khokar et al, 2005), SCIAMACHY (Afe et al, 2004), OMI (Krotkov et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2007Yang et al, , 2010Li et al, 2013;Theys et al, 2015), GOME-2 Bobrowski et al, 2010;Nowlan et al, 2011;Rix et al, 2012;Hörmann et al, 2013) and OMPS . In particular, the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) has largely demonstrated the value of satellite UV-visible remote sensing (1) in monitoring volcanic plumes in near-real time (Brenot et al, 2014) and changes in volcanic degassing at the global scale , and references therein) and (2) in detecting and quantifying large anthropogenic SO 2 emissions, weak or N. Theys et al: S-5P SO 2 algorithm theoretical basis unreported emission sources worldwide (Theys et al, 2015;Fioletov et al, 2016;McLinden et al, 2016) as well as investigating their long-term changes van der A et al, 2016;He et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%