2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5062845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band structure and carrier effective masses of boron arsenide: Effects of quasiparticle and spin-orbit coupling corrections

Abstract: We determine the fundamental electronic and optical properties of the high-thermal-conductivity III-V semiconductor boron arsenide (BAs) using density functional and many body perturbation theory including quasiparticle and spin-orbit coupling corrections. We find that the fundamental band gap is indirect with a value of 2.049 eV, while the minimum direct gap has a value of 4.135 eV. We calculate the carrier effective masses and report smaller values for the holes than the electrons, indicating higher hole mob… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
34
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sub-band-gap absorption is attributed to surface and bulk defects and impurities that can potentially exist in BAs grown by chemical vapor transport technique. We also find that excitons have a sizeable effect on the direct absorption in BAs, which is consistent with previous estimates of exciton binding energies around 40 meV 6,11 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The sub-band-gap absorption is attributed to surface and bulk defects and impurities that can potentially exist in BAs grown by chemical vapor transport technique. We also find that excitons have a sizeable effect on the direct absorption in BAs, which is consistent with previous estimates of exciton binding energies around 40 meV 6,11 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…1. All three approaches show energy dispersion that is similar to that found in other studies, [16][17][18]27,29 with an indirect energy gap between the valence band maximum (VBM) at the Γ point and the conduction band minimum (CBM) along the Γ to X direction, at about 80% of the distance to the X point and a minimum direct gap at Γ, but there are differences in particular features such as the band gaps, curvatures and spin-orbit splittings. Indeed, we exclude the band structures determined using QSGW and sQSGW from Fig.…”
Section: Calculationssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The nature of indirect bandgap semiconductor is quickly confirmed because despite their differences in absorption at lower energy tails, all of them exhibit the same and well defined absorption edge. The intersections give us a band gap of 1.82 eV, which falls in the range of the latest DFT calculations 10,11,12,13 . Compared to UV-Vis, PL is more sensitive to the crystal quality, defects and doping levels 21 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…However, despite BAs being first studied in the late 50s of the last century 1 , its actual bandgap value has not been well settled. The bandgap from latest first principles DFT calculations by several independent groups begins to merge, but still falls in a wide range from 1.7 -2.1 eV 10,11,12,13 . The bandgap from earlier calculations was either too high 14 or too low 15 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%