2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.71.195103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band structures of rare-gas solids within theGWapproximation

Abstract: Band structures for solid rare gases ͑Ne, Ar͒ have been calculated using the GW approximation. All electron and pseudopotential ab initio calculations were performed using Gaussian orbital basis sets and the dependence of particle-hole gaps and electron affinities on basis set and treatment of core electrons is investigated. All electron GW calculations have a smaller particle-hole gap than pseudopotential GW calculations by up to 0.2 eV. Quasiparticle electron and hole excitation energies, valence bandwidths … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The basis used for Ne is smaller than that used previously for a GW calculation on Ne while the Ar basis is the same as used previously (basis set 2 in Ref. [35]). …”
Section: B Electron-hole Excitations and Optical Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The basis used for Ne is smaller than that used previously for a GW calculation on Ne while the Ar basis is the same as used previously (basis set 2 in Ref. [35]). …”
Section: B Electron-hole Excitations and Optical Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of GW calculations as well as quasiparticle band structures along symmetry lines for Ar and Ne are given in Ref. [35]. The CRYSTAL code 38 was used to generate single-particle wave functions for Ne and Ar in an all-electron Gaussian orbital basis and the Coulomb potential was expanded in plane waves.…”
Section: A Quasiparticle Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GW band gap of 20.04 eV, calculated by Galamić-Mulaomerović and Patterson, is relatively accurate. 36 The DMC method can also be used to perform highly accurate band-gap calculations, 37,38 although we have not done this for neon.…”
Section: B Band Gap Of Solid Neonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once one demands to do a better approximation to take into account the quantum fluctuations, one may consider dressing the interaction lines in the HF self-energy diagrams using random phase approximation (RPA) [8]. This extension leads to the so-called GW method [9][10][11][12][13]. Another way to improve from the HF approximation level may be done by replacing the interaction lines with particle-particle vertex functions built from ladder diagrams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%