2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10825-020-01521-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bandgap modulation of low-dimensional γ-graphyne-1 under uniform strain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20] The calculated band gap in DFT methods are usually underestimated, particularly in large band gap materials suchlike γgraphyne-1 [26,25]. In this research, the calculated band gap energy in DFTB method is 1.34 eV agreed with the previous calculations and is between the comparably precise HSE06 method and the single experimental results [27,28]. Hence DFTB is a reliable method and is utilized in all calculations in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[20] The calculated band gap in DFT methods are usually underestimated, particularly in large band gap materials suchlike γgraphyne-1 [26,25]. In this research, the calculated band gap energy in DFTB method is 1.34 eV agreed with the previous calculations and is between the comparably precise HSE06 method and the single experimental results [27,28]. Hence DFTB is a reliable method and is utilized in all calculations in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The 2AGyNT and 2ZGyNT are the smallest nanotubes but 2AGyNT has relatively lower chemical stability due to its low cohesive energy E coh = − 8.13eV whereas 3AGyNT and 2ZGyNT with nearly equal E coh = − 8.30eV have chemically higher stability. Besides diameter of 2AGyNT is 4.4nm with high in plain strain that causes to shrinkage length of its UR up to 2% [27]. As a result, in this paper two GAA homojunction p-i-n TFETs are constructed and investigated using 2ZGyNT and 3AGyNT with diameter values of 7.6 Å and 7.6√3/2= 6.6 Å, respectively.…”
Section: ( ) [ ( ) ( )]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation