2024
DOI: 10.1109/jqe.2024.3367951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bandwidth Optimization and Fabrication of High-Power MUTC-PD

Xuejie Wang,
Yongqing Huang,
Shuhu Tan
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0.22 dBm (1.05 mW) at 300 GHz with 15.5 mA photocurrent and 2.01 dBm (1.59 mW) with the optimized bias at 18 mA photocurrent [132,133], while the output power is up to 4.04 dBm (2.53 mW) at 273 GHz with the optimized bias voltage at 18 mA photocurrent when this PD integrates with a taper slot antenna [134,135], as shown in Figure 18. The comparisons of 3-dB bandwidth, responsivity, saturation current or 1-dB compression saturation current and RF output power for different PDs [67,94,95,97,101,111,[113][114][115]119,[121][122][123][124]130,131,134,[136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152] are shown in Table 2. In brief, the PD saturation current and RF output power is affected by several factors, including device area, PD types, bias voltage, fabrication quality, CPW design, junction heat with high-bias voltages, short microwave stub [131], submounts, measurements and so on, which need to be considered comprehensively.…”
Section: Saturation Current and Output Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…0.22 dBm (1.05 mW) at 300 GHz with 15.5 mA photocurrent and 2.01 dBm (1.59 mW) with the optimized bias at 18 mA photocurrent [132,133], while the output power is up to 4.04 dBm (2.53 mW) at 273 GHz with the optimized bias voltage at 18 mA photocurrent when this PD integrates with a taper slot antenna [134,135], as shown in Figure 18. The comparisons of 3-dB bandwidth, responsivity, saturation current or 1-dB compression saturation current and RF output power for different PDs [67,94,95,97,101,111,[113][114][115]119,[121][122][123][124]130,131,134,[136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152] are shown in Table 2. In brief, the PD saturation current and RF output power is affected by several factors, including device area, PD types, bias voltage, fabrication quality, CPW design, junction heat with high-bias voltages, short microwave stub [131], submounts, measurements and so on, which need to be considered comprehensively.…”
Section: Saturation Current and Output Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the wafer-bonding technique, InP-based UTC-PD bonded on the SiC substrate [39] can increase the RF output power to a mW-level, i.e., 0.22 dBm (1.05 mW) at 300 GHz with 15.5 mA photocurrent and 2.01 dBm (1.59 mW) with the optimized bias at 18 mA photocurrent [132,133], while the output power is up to 4.04 dBm (2.53 mW) at 273 GHz with the optimized bias voltage at 18 mA photocurrent when this PD integrates with a taper slot antenna [134,135], as shown in Figure 18. The comparisons of 3-dB bandwidth, responsivity, saturation current or 1-dB compression saturation current and RF output power for different PDs [67,94,95,97,101,111,[113][114][115]119,[121][122][123][124]130,131,134,[136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152] are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Saturation Current and Output Powermentioning
confidence: 99%