Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Multimedia Alternate Realities 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3132361.3132364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bandwidth Reduction of Omnidirectional Viewport-Dependent Video Streaming via Subjective Quality Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When evaluating compression schemes, Differential Mean Opinion Score (DMOS) is often used as a DCR metric, evaluating the difference between the quality of the compressed content and the original's: this is a fundamental step of the evaluation of new coding schemes, for both standard and omnidirectional content [99]. Omnidirectional video content is even more challenging, as static image quality is not the only component that influences QoE, and even subjective studies need to consider FoV changes and how the different encoding of foreground and background affects the experience [100]. A testing methodology that considers the dynamic aspect of QoE, accounting for delays between user motion and the high-quality rendering of the video in the new direction, is presented in [101].…”
Section: Measuring Qoe: Subjective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When evaluating compression schemes, Differential Mean Opinion Score (DMOS) is often used as a DCR metric, evaluating the difference between the quality of the compressed content and the original's: this is a fundamental step of the evaluation of new coding schemes, for both standard and omnidirectional content [99]. Omnidirectional video content is even more challenging, as static image quality is not the only component that influences QoE, and even subjective studies need to consider FoV changes and how the different encoding of foreground and background affects the experience [100]. A testing methodology that considers the dynamic aspect of QoE, accounting for delays between user motion and the high-quality rendering of the video in the new direction, is presented in [101].…”
Section: Measuring Qoe: Subjective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [114] also released their dataset, with 21 participants watching 75 impaired video sequences with different resolution and compression levels. There are other small-scale datasets associated to other measurement studies [100,115], while two more large dataset, with 13 subject watching 150 videos and 23 subjects watching 384, were presented in [116] and [117], respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the largest available dataset was presented in [118], and is divided in 5 scenarios with an approximately uniform division of samples.…”
Section: Measuring Qoe: Subjective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is observed that the equal-area mapping yields around 8.3% bitrate savings relative to the commonly used equirectangular mapping. Ghaznavi-Youvalari et al and Curcio et al [24,25] adopted subjective assessment results of experiments using a tile-based streaming system for OV.…”
Section: Mobile Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viewport-dependent streaming model dramatically reduces the required bitrate, achieving bandwidth savings up to 40% [16]. These savings can be further improved with the help of additional practices, such as using different tiling schemes, predicting tiles that will be viewed [23] or using unequal quality levels for each eye in case of stereoscopic video [24]. On the other hand, the viewport-dependent model introduces a new problem of motion-to-high quality delay.…”
Section: Figure 2 Example Of Standard Streaming Framework For Omnidirectional Content [2]mentioning
confidence: 99%