2018
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aac3fa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bang-bang shortcut to adiabaticity in the Dicke model as realized in a Penning trap experiment

Abstract: We introduce a bang-bang shortcut to adiabaticity for the Dicke model, which we implement via a 2-D array of trapped ions in a Penning trap with a spindependent force detuned close to the center-of-mass drumhead mode. Our focus is on employing this shortcut to create highly entangled states that can be used in highprecision metrology. We highlight that the performance of the bang-bang approach is comparable to standard preparation methods, but can be applied over a much shorter time frame. We compare these the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been employed, for instance, in studies of ground-state and excited-state quantum phase tran-sitions [33,[40][41][42][43][44], entanglement creation [45], nonequilibrium dynamics [46][47][48][49], quantum chaos [50][51][52][53], and monodromy [54,55]. Recently, the model has received revived attention due to new experiments with ion traps [56,57] and the analysis of the OTOC [58,59].In the classical limit, the Dicke model presents regular and chaotic regions depending on the Hamiltonian parameters and excitation energies [53]. This allows us to benchmark the OTOC growth against the presence and absence of chaos.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been employed, for instance, in studies of ground-state and excited-state quantum phase tran-sitions [33,[40][41][42][43][44], entanglement creation [45], nonequilibrium dynamics [46][47][48][49], quantum chaos [50][51][52][53], and monodromy [54,55]. Recently, the model has received revived attention due to new experiments with ion traps [56,57] and the analysis of the OTOC [58,59].In the classical limit, the Dicke model presents regular and chaotic regions depending on the Hamiltonian parameters and excitation energies [53]. This allows us to benchmark the OTOC growth against the presence and absence of chaos.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1D), the signal is just the OTOC S ϕ = I z (t)Φ(t)I z (t)Φ β=0 . We can further evaluate the OTO commutator [25,[32][33][34] C zz = |[I z , I z (t)]| 2 β=0 , by repeating the experiment varying ϕ in integer steps, ϕ n = 2πn/Q, n = 1, ..., Q and extracting its discrete Fourier transform [20], S δ q (t) = Q n=1 e iqϕ S δ ϕn (t). The MQC intensities S q represent the contribution of all coherences of order q in the density matrix of the multispin state, where a coherence q with respect to a given basis (here the Zeeman basis |m z ) is any element r|ρ|s with s − r = q.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the interaction picture with respect to the phonon modes and keeping only near‐resonant terms we then obtain HnormalΩig2σi+()aprefixeinormalΔx,bt+aprefixeinormalΔx,rt+normalH.normalc.where we identified abx,COM and gηnormalCOMxξnormalCOMxnormalΩx. We now define trueleftωc=0true12(normalΔx,b+normalΔx,r),leftω0=0true12(normalΔx,bnormalΔx,r)and after eliminating the time‐dependence via the unitary transformation Ufalse(tfalse)=prefixei(ωcaa+ω0Sz)t we obtain the effective Hamiltonian truerightHefffalse(xfalse)ωcaa+ω0Sz+g(a+a)SxThis and closely related schemes have already been discussed in many previous works for implementing effective Rabi‐ and Dicke models,...…”
Section: Effective Cavity Qed Models With Trapped Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we investigate the use of systems of trapped ions as a quantum simulator for multi‐dipole cavity QED systems in the USC regime. This platform is naturally suited for this purpose since experimental techniques for implementing Jaynes–Cummings‐, Rabi‐ and Dicke‐type couplings between the internal atomic states and motional modes (which represent the photons in the effective model) are already well established . However, for N>1 such models provide very restricted or inconsistent descriptions of quantum electrodynamics beyond the weak‐coupling regime and must be complemented by additional interaction terms .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%