2022
DOI: 10.2218/pihph.7.2022.7328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bangime: secret language, language isolate, or language island? A computer‐assisted case study

Abstract: We report the results of a qualitative and quantitative lexical comparison between Bangime and neighboring languages. Our results indicate that the status of the language as an isolate remains viable, and that Bangime speakers have had different levels of language contact with other Malian populations at various points throughout their history. Bangime speakers, the Bangande, claim Dogon ancestry. The Bangande portray this connection to Dogon through the fact that the language has both rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 12 lexemes he provides, over half are monosyllabic, thus increasing the likelihood of chance resemblances. While certain others are somewhat convincing, such as NOSE, Hantgan & List (2018) have discussed the similarities between Bangime body parts and those of Dogon but with mixed meanings; see NOSE in Bangime in comparison with EAR among many of the Dogon languages. Others such as CLOUD and RIVER are considered in our sample to be borrowings, rather than cognates; Blench suggests that CLOUD in Bangime is cognate with various Nilo-Saharan languages and that RIVER is shared between Dogon and Songhai.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 12 lexemes he provides, over half are monosyllabic, thus increasing the likelihood of chance resemblances. While certain others are somewhat convincing, such as NOSE, Hantgan & List (2018) have discussed the similarities between Bangime body parts and those of Dogon but with mixed meanings; see NOSE in Bangime in comparison with EAR among many of the Dogon languages. Others such as CLOUD and RIVER are considered in our sample to be borrowings, rather than cognates; Blench suggests that CLOUD in Bangime is cognate with various Nilo-Saharan languages and that RIVER is shared between Dogon and Songhai.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a statistical standpoint, a limitation of this dataset is its somewhat skewed coverage. Despite this, we decided not to remove languages or concepts as was done in Hantgan & List (2018) , because of the qualitative aspect of the study; it was crucial for us to examine individual lexical items in the borrowing context despite the fact that they were not represented across all languages so as to at least find tendencies and directions for future, broader, studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These methods treat phonetically transcribed words in spoken languages as sound sequences and then seek to identify similar sequences by using techniques originally designed for computer science and evolutionary biology ( List, 2014 ). Since sequence comparison techniques are primarily applied to identify cognate words (words shared by common inheritance), most methods that make use of them can only identify borrowings between genetically unrelated languages ( van der Ark et al , 2007 ; Mennecier et al , 2016 ; Zhang et al , 2021 ) and only a few attempts have been made to identify borrowings in genetically related languages ( Hantgan & List, forthcoming ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%