2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10693-008-0040-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank Capital Ratios Across Countries: Why Do They Vary?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
73
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the elasticity of market (book) leverage to profitability, measured by ROAA, is −0.053 for our sample, compared with that of −0.018 in Gropp and Heider (2010). Our results are relatively consistent with those of Brewer III et al (2008), who find that size is negatively related to banks' equity ratios. Consistent with the corporate finance view, leverage decreases with profitability, suggesting that banks with greater internal funds are less likely to tap into the external capital market and hence have lower leverage.…”
Section: Baseline Results: Buffer View Versus Corporate Finance Viewsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the elasticity of market (book) leverage to profitability, measured by ROAA, is −0.053 for our sample, compared with that of −0.018 in Gropp and Heider (2010). Our results are relatively consistent with those of Brewer III et al (2008), who find that size is negatively related to banks' equity ratios. Consistent with the corporate finance view, leverage decreases with profitability, suggesting that banks with greater internal funds are less likely to tap into the external capital market and hence have lower leverage.…”
Section: Baseline Results: Buffer View Versus Corporate Finance Viewsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…1 Putting it differently, standard corporate finance theories should have little power in explaining the crosssectional variation in leverage for banks. Barth, Caprio, and Levine (2005), Berger, Herring, and Szegö (1995), and Brewer III, Kaufman, and Wall (2008) find that historically banks hold higher levels of capital than the regulatory minimum. Interestingly, the Tier 1 capital ratio shows considerable variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an analysis of differences in capital ratios across countries see, among others, Brewer et al . ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such limited variation in leverage could exaggerate the credit-spread puzzle in the banking industry. However, some banks may choose to hold additional levels of capital buffers in excess of the regulatory requirement and hence have lower leverage to reduce the probability that they have to raise costly equity or suffer from exogenous shocks in case they occur (Barth et al 2006;Berger et al 1995;Brewer et al 2008;Diamond and Rajan 2000;Flannery 1994;Tian et al 2013). Therefore, banks can have optimal leverage ratios cross-sectionally just as nonfinancial firms do.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%