2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2793484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Bank Profitability: A Case of Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
15
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From the fixed effects model results with the dependent variables of ROA, ROE, and OPRWA, GDPGR confirm positive and significant relationships, meaning a positive influence exists in the variables’ relationships. The results are aligned with the findings in Basarır and Sarıhan (2017); Boitan (2015); Pradhan (2016); Topak and Talu (2017) although the study by Rehman et al. (2018) has not been confirmed since the author envisages a negative influence of GDP on profitability of banks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…From the fixed effects model results with the dependent variables of ROA, ROE, and OPRWA, GDPGR confirm positive and significant relationships, meaning a positive influence exists in the variables’ relationships. The results are aligned with the findings in Basarır and Sarıhan (2017); Boitan (2015); Pradhan (2016); Topak and Talu (2017) although the study by Rehman et al. (2018) has not been confirmed since the author envisages a negative influence of GDP on profitability of banks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In Table 3, the regression coefficient of loan to deposit ratio (β1 = -0.022, p <.01) indicates that a higher loan to deposit ratio resulted in the lower ROA to the Nepalese commercial banks. This result is in line with the findings of prior researchers (Adolopo, Lloydking, & Tauringgana, 2018;Asmed, Koh, & Shaharudin, 2016;Tarraze, 2015), but contradicts the findings of some other researchers (Pradhan, 2016;Tan, 2016;Tan, 2017). The result of this regression coefficient was supported by these facts: Relatively high levels of loan to deposit ratio (lower liquidity) produced negative ROA and reduced liquid funds in order to grab market opportunities, eventually lowering the bank's profitability.…”
Section: Regression Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Though the significant factor of banking profitability seems alike, the direction of impact of external factors like market share (here represented by concentration ratio) and GDP also contradict with the study of Pradhan (2018) in Nepalese context.…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 70%