2007
DOI: 10.3133/sir20075162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bankfull Regional Curves for Streams in the Non-Urban, Non-Tidal Coastal Plain Physiographic Province, Virginia and Maryland

Abstract: Vertical coordinate information is referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the North American Datum of 1927 (NAD27).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean value of the exponent of the bankfull mean depth regression For the southeastern portion of the U.S., Brockman et al (2012) reported that exponents of regional curves for bankfull mean depth typically ranged between 0.25 and 0.43. Based on prior studies, it was expected that mean bankfull depth would exhibit a greater number of poor fits than the other bankfull parameters (Table 7) (Chaplin, 2005;Keaton et al, 2005;Krstolic and Chaplin, 2007;Mistak and Stille, 2008;Brockman et al, 2012). In some instances, drainage area explained almost none of the variability in bankfull mean depth such as with HLRs 8, 14, 17, and 20, which had R 2 values of 0.10, 0.23, 0.22, and 0.22, respectively.…”
Section: Journal Of the American Water Resources Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean value of the exponent of the bankfull mean depth regression For the southeastern portion of the U.S., Brockman et al (2012) reported that exponents of regional curves for bankfull mean depth typically ranged between 0.25 and 0.43. Based on prior studies, it was expected that mean bankfull depth would exhibit a greater number of poor fits than the other bankfull parameters (Table 7) (Chaplin, 2005;Keaton et al, 2005;Krstolic and Chaplin, 2007;Mistak and Stille, 2008;Brockman et al, 2012). In some instances, drainage area explained almost none of the variability in bankfull mean depth such as with HLRs 8, 14, 17, and 20, which had R 2 values of 0.10, 0.23, 0.22, and 0.22, respectively.…”
Section: Journal Of the American Water Resources Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of Regional Curve in Various Piedmont Regions. MD (This study) VA and MD (Krstolic, 2007) Northwest FL (Metcalf, 2009) North FL (Metcalf,2009) NC (Sweet, 2003) FIGURE 9. Comparison of Regional Curve in Various Coastal Plain Regions.…”
Section: Journal Of the American Water Resources Associationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interestingly, none of the sites in this study had a return interval of 2.0 years or greater and only seven sites from the other studies exceeded 2.0 years or greater return intervals. Those with return intervals of 2.0 years or greater included four from Lotspeich (), one from Chaplin (), and one from Krstolic and Chaplin (), and one from Keaton et al . ().…”
Section: Comparisons To Other Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the pioneering work of Dunne and Leopold (1978), numerous researchers have developed the regional hydraulic geometry relationships for different regions of the United States of America (MOODY and ODEM, 1999;HARMAN et al, 1999;WHITE, 2001;CASTRO and JACKSON, 2001;McCANDLESS, 2003;SWEET and GERATZ, 2003;CINNOTO, 2003;EMMERT, 2004;MESSINGER and WILEY, 2004;SHERWOOD and HUITGER, 2005;KEATON et al, 2005;KRSTOLIC and CHAPLIN, 2007;MULVIHILL et al, 2009;AGOURIDIS et al, 2011;MODRICK and GEORGAKAKOS,2014; among others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%