2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2016.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Banking competition and firm-level financial constraints in Latin America

Abstract: Prior literature argues that, given the existence of information asymmetries and agency costs, higher competition may increase financial constraints by reducing banks' incentives to build lending relationships. Using a sample of listed firms for six Latin American countries, we analyze the relation between banking competition and financial constraints. We find evidence in line with prior research that banking competition increases financial constraints. This result is robust and heterogeneous. We include other… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(77 reference statements)
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where firm size is captured by (the log of) firm assets, and the length of relationship is computed as the difference between the date of loan l, and the period in which the firm-bank pair appeared for the first time in the loan-level dataset. The inclusion of this variable capturing credit history is a conceptual and methodological contribution of this paper, since it is not available from the kind of firm-and bank-level datasets used by previous studies like Fungacova et al (2017), Alvarez andJara (2016) andvan Leuvensteijn et al (2013). We view the length of a credit relationship as a better measure of asymmetric information for a specific bank-firm pair than other measures used in previous work such as firm size.…”
Section: Bank Market Power and The Cost Of Credit: Baseline Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where firm size is captured by (the log of) firm assets, and the length of relationship is computed as the difference between the date of loan l, and the period in which the firm-bank pair appeared for the first time in the loan-level dataset. The inclusion of this variable capturing credit history is a conceptual and methodological contribution of this paper, since it is not available from the kind of firm-and bank-level datasets used by previous studies like Fungacova et al (2017), Alvarez andJara (2016) andvan Leuvensteijn et al (2013). We view the length of a credit relationship as a better measure of asymmetric information for a specific bank-firm pair than other measures used in previous work such as firm size.…”
Section: Bank Market Power and The Cost Of Credit: Baseline Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the paper can only approximate the cost of credit at the firm-level using accounting data. The papers by Love and Martinez-Peria (2015), Leon (2015) and Alvarez and Jara (2016) make use of the Boone indicator but rather than looking at interest rate spreads are forced to use a dichotomous measure of financial constraints due to data limitations. Alvarez and Jara (2016) has the additional disadvantage that only listed firms were used in the study.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increased competition in the banking industry resulting from greater information sharing reduces bank profits in the second period, but not in the first when the banks still have private information (Alvarez & Jara, 2016). Consequently, a greater degree of information sharing reduces the market power of the banks and informational earnings, thus curbing interest rates, moral risk and default rates while increasing the volume of credit provided by the banking sector.…”
Section: Institutional Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the information hypothesis argues that, given the existence of information asymmetries and agency costs, higher competition increases financial constraints by reducing banks' incentives to build lending relationships [18]. Also, previous empirical evidence, which has mostly used concentration measures as proxies for competition, is also mixed [15,17,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%