2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2938236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Banking on Deposits: Maturity Transformation Without Interest Rate Risk

Abstract: for their comments. We also thank Patrick Farrell, Manasa Gopal, and Pauline Liang for excellent research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
146
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(45 reference statements)
11
146
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with the previous three findings. Taken all pieces of evidence together, my results support a view that lies in between the classic textbook case and the one by Drechsler, Savov and Schnabl (2018). While banks engage in active risk management to reduce their interest rate risk exposure, such a risk transfer is not perfect.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are consistent with the previous three findings. Taken all pieces of evidence together, my results support a view that lies in between the classic textbook case and the one by Drechsler, Savov and Schnabl (2018). While banks engage in active risk management to reduce their interest rate risk exposure, such a risk transfer is not perfect.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…That is, if deposits behave like long-term liabilities, it is in fact optimal to invest in long-term fixedrate assets. Taken together, Drechsler, Savov and Schnabl (2018) argue that banks do not take on interest rate risk, despite having a large maturity mismatch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In specifications with and without institution fixed effects, we find a negative and statistically significant 20 From the perspective of the traditional view of banking as institutions with long-term assets and short-term liabilities, which suggests a sizeable maturity gap, the level of hedging may seem surprisingly low at first blush. However, recent evidence in Drechsler, Savov, and Schnabl (2018) suggests that the interest rate sensitivity of deposit rates is quite low in practice, suggesting that deposits are less short term than previously thought, and thus the maturity gap that financial institutions face may be considerably lower than the traditional view suggests. Therefore, the limited level of interest rate risk management may not be so puzzling after all.…”
Section: E Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Using very meaningful data on the credit risk and interest rate risk exposures of German banks, we confirm their findings. Another reason for a bank being exposed to interest rate risk is put forward by Drechsler, Savov, and Schnabl (2018). They argue that the de facto duration of customer deposits is much larger than the de jure one and that the banks are, therefore, said to be exposed to interest rate risk if they invest in long-term loans that are financed with customer deposits.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%