2016 12th IAPR Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/das.2016.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Banknote Counterfeit Detection through Background Texture Printing Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Python has also been used to develop and implement a framework for the identification of Pakistani currency. Berenguel et al (2016) also worked on methods by which to identify genuine and photocopied bank notes. The technique applied was to differentiate the texture between the original and photocopied notes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Python has also been used to develop and implement a framework for the identification of Pakistani currency. Berenguel et al (2016) also worked on methods by which to identify genuine and photocopied bank notes. The technique applied was to differentiate the texture between the original and photocopied notes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usage of most common and simple Adam optimizer and ReLU activation the proposed approach reached its apex at 55% accuracy. To secure a dataset with a resolution of 1200dpi expensive scanners and many cameras were employed by [7]. The approach narrowly focuses on just the intaglio printing which are manually cropped.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of results has been depicted below by the confusion matrices in Table IV and V, and column graph with test accuracy against epochs where columns represent accuracy when dropout was included and excluded respectively ( Fig 4.1 ). The performance of proposed approach is evaluated against accuracy (6) and sensitivity (7) with obtained values 85%, 91% for test dataset and 87%, 92% for train dataset respectively ( Fig 4.2 ).…”
Section: Fig 34 -Flow Diagram For Training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Texture descriptor: Although any texture feature can be used to represent the textures, we have selected dense SIFT because it is generally very competitive, outperforming specialized texture descriptors [10], [14].…”
Section: Counterfeit Modulementioning
confidence: 99%