2020
DOI: 10.3390/h9040131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Banned Books behind Bars: Prototyping a Data Repository to Combat Arbitrary Censorship Practices in U.S. Prisons

Abstract: “Banned Books Behind Bars” is a social justice project that aims to shed light on the complex problem of information access in prison and to explore potential prototypes for possible solutions to some of these obstacles, in particular access to books and printed information. The United States is home to five percent of the world’s population but a staggering twenty-five percent of the world’s total prisoners. For many incarcerated individuals, access to information is a struggle: censorship, book banning, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prison library literature often alludes to the opposing values of prisons and libraries (Boyington and Barnes, 2021; Vogel, 2009). Finlay and Bates (2018: 122) note that incarceration ‘inherently limits the freedom, privacy and autonomy of individuals – three ingredients that are key to the provision of effective library services.’ Censorship of library material is common and often dependent on subjective decisions by prison officials (Cauley, 2020). The volatile and unpredictable nature of the prison environment can disrupt scheduled library events and inhibit access to the library space, and prisoners working elsewhere in the prison or participating in education classes may not be free to attend the library during its opening hours (Finlay, 2020).…”
Section: Challenges Of Providing Prison Library Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prison library literature often alludes to the opposing values of prisons and libraries (Boyington and Barnes, 2021; Vogel, 2009). Finlay and Bates (2018: 122) note that incarceration ‘inherently limits the freedom, privacy and autonomy of individuals – three ingredients that are key to the provision of effective library services.’ Censorship of library material is common and often dependent on subjective decisions by prison officials (Cauley, 2020). The volatile and unpredictable nature of the prison environment can disrupt scheduled library events and inhibit access to the library space, and prisoners working elsewhere in the prison or participating in education classes may not be free to attend the library during its opening hours (Finlay, 2020).…”
Section: Challenges Of Providing Prison Library Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%