Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3419111.3421291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baoverlay

Abstract: Container storage commonly relies on overlay file systems to interpose read-only container images upon backing file systems. While being transparent to and compatible with most existing backing file systems, the overlay file-system approach imposes nontrivial I/O overhead to containerized applications, especially for writes: To write a file originating from a read-only container image, the whole file will be copied to a separate, writable storage layer, resulting in long write latency and inefficient use of co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It brings the virtualization overhead in runtime, lowering the user experience. More importantly, they can hardly support virtualizing a specific hardware, such as graphic processing unit (GPU), due to the limitation of nested virtual machine (VM) [7]. Although VOI brings native performance, the loading of a large image, typically over 30 GB, leads to unacceptable loading latency limited by the network bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It brings the virtualization overhead in runtime, lowering the user experience. More importantly, they can hardly support virtualizing a specific hardware, such as graphic processing unit (GPU), due to the limitation of nested virtual machine (VM) [7]. Although VOI brings native performance, the loading of a large image, typically over 30 GB, leads to unacceptable loading latency limited by the network bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%