2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01381.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barbed compared with standard suture: Effects on cellular composition and proliferation of the healing wound in the ovine uterus

Abstract: Both barbed and standard sutures had similar effects on cellular composition and proliferation of uterine wounds in an animal model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Small bowel obstruction has been reported in humans, secondary to adhesion and torsion of the mesentery to the tail of the barbed suture placed during abdominal surgical procedures . Adhesion formation was assessed in an ovine study comparing closure of incisions in the uterine horns with smooth versus barbed suture . Most animals formed adhesions at both sites and no difference was found between suture types .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small bowel obstruction has been reported in humans, secondary to adhesion and torsion of the mesentery to the tail of the barbed suture placed during abdominal surgical procedures . Adhesion formation was assessed in an ovine study comparing closure of incisions in the uterine horns with smooth versus barbed suture . Most animals formed adhesions at both sites and no difference was found between suture types .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal models, the use of barbed suture leads to the same healing of the uterine breach as with the use of traditional filaments [46]. Indeed, the use of barbed sutures or traditional filaments determinates the same quality of connective tissue, muscle cells, smooth muscle cell actin expression, and the similar proliferation of cells in the ovine uterine wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images were then analyzed using the ImagePro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD) for labeling index (percentage of proliferating Ki-67-positive cells of the total number of cells within an alveolar area [Einarsson et al, 2012]) or to calculate capillary area density (total capillary area as a proportion of tissue area) and capillary surface density (total capillary circumference per unit of tissue area). Images were then analyzed using the ImagePro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD) for labeling index (percentage of proliferating Ki-67-positive cells of the total number of cells within an alveolar area [Einarsson et al, 2012]) or to calculate capillary area density (total capillary area as a proportion of tissue area) and capillary surface density (total capillary circumference per unit of tissue area).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%