2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00856.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barcoding, molecular taxonomy, and exploration of the diversity of shrews (Soricomorpha: Soricidae) on Mount Nimba (Guinea)

Abstract: We tested the efficiency of cytochrome oxidase I (COI)‐barcoding as a taxonomic tool to discriminate and identify sympatric shrew species on Mount Nimba (Guinea). We identified 148 specimens at the species level using morphological characters and comparison with type specimens, including several taxa from Mount Nimba. We identified ten morphospecies and tested aspects of genetic diversity and monophyly using genetic data from three mitochondrial (16S, cytochrome b, and COI) and one nuclear marker (the breast c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() with 14.3–20.6% and Jacquet et al . () with 5.5–20.4%. Specimens of clades I and II were found to occur in sympatry across the range of clade II (Ziama, Dieke, Tokadeh, Mt Ghi and Tai National Park), and the absence of recombination (congruence between all markers) implies reproductive isolation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() with 14.3–20.6% and Jacquet et al . () with 5.5–20.4%. Specimens of clades I and II were found to occur in sympatry across the range of clade II (Ziama, Dieke, Tokadeh, Mt Ghi and Tai National Park), and the absence of recombination (congruence between all markers) implies reproductive isolation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the morphology of shrews is known to be highly dependent on their environment (Rychlik, Ramalhinho, & Polly, 2006) and a taxonomy based exclusively on such information can lead to the grouping of phylogenetically unrelated forms (Jacquet et al, 2013). Cytogenetic and allozyme studies (Maddalena, 1990;Meylan, 1971;Meylan & Vogel, 1982;Schlitter, Hutterer, Maddalena, & Robins, 1999) and several recent molecular phylogenies (Ceríaco et al, 2015;Dubey et al, 2008;Jacquet, Nicolas, Bonillo, Cruaud, & Denys, 2012;Quérouil et al, 2005) shed new light on the systematics of this group. No molecular study including all the species of the complex was carried out, and previous sampling schemes were not suitable (few specimens and specimens from few localities) to sort apart intra-versus interspecific divergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the C. poensis complex, similar divergence values are seen between the closely related species C. buettikoferi , C. theresae , and C. grandiceps (5.5 -8.1%, Jacquet et al 2012 ). Our values are also above the limit of intraspecific variations described for Soricidae (0 -5.2%, Fumagalli et al 1999 ) and for the genus Crocidura (0 -3.4%, Jacquet et al 2012 ). Nevertheless, Vogel et al (2003) noticed intraspecific values ranging from 0.4 to 8.9% within the genus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%