2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2010.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barcoding Tetrahymena: Discriminating Species and Identifying Unknowns Using the Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit I (cox-1) Barcode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
74
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mitochondrial cox 1barcodes reported by Chantangsi et al [25] and Kher et al [33] are better able to discriminate among Tetrahymena species than nuclear SSU sequences. Using the extensive collection of Tetrahymena species in the American Type Culture Collection these authors defined a 689 nucleotide cox 1 barcode and provided ~1600–2300 SSU nucleotide sequences for most named Tetrahymena species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mitochondrial cox 1barcodes reported by Chantangsi et al [25] and Kher et al [33] are better able to discriminate among Tetrahymena species than nuclear SSU sequences. Using the extensive collection of Tetrahymena species in the American Type Culture Collection these authors defined a 689 nucleotide cox 1 barcode and provided ~1600–2300 SSU nucleotide sequences for most named Tetrahymena species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the extensive collection of Tetrahymena species in the American Type Culture Collection these authors defined a 689 nucleotide cox 1 barcode and provided ~1600–2300 SSU nucleotide sequences for most named Tetrahymena species. Kher et al [33] also showed that unknowns can, in most instances, be identified by the cox 1 barcodes. The cox 1 sequence of the type strain (Table 1) designated by Chantangsi et al [25] and Kher et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unresolved internal relationship raises the question whether these sequences are from different populations of one species. Since designations of the species in the T. pyriformis complex are based on a combination of ecological, morphological, biochemical, and molecular features, it is likely that the SSU rRNA gene is too conserved to reveal interspecific variation within the genus Tetrahymena (Kher et al 2011). The cox1 gene of two geographically isolated populations of T. australis, i.e.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Wuhan Population Of Tetrahymena Australis mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we assign this recent isolate from E. pacifica, the type host of P. oregonensis, to this species and provide a revised morphological characterization (see below) and genetically characterize the species using the SSU rDNA and cox1 gene sequences. Genetic characterization of ciliate species is becoming more common since extensive comparative molecular genetic research on the biological species of Tetrahymena (Kher et al 2011) and Paramecium (Strüder-Kypke & Lynn 2010, Przyboś et al 2013 using the mitochondrial cox1 gene has demonstrated significant interspecific variation. For example, Kher et al (2011) concluded that a > 5% difference in cox1 identifies different biological species of Tetrahymena, while Strüder-Kypke & Lynn (2010) concluded that this criterion rises to > 20% for biological species of Paramecium.…”
Section: T Spinifera (29) Hq965963mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic characterization of ciliate species is becoming more common since extensive comparative molecular genetic research on the biological species of Tetrahymena (Kher et al 2011) and Paramecium (Strüder-Kypke & Lynn 2010, Przyboś et al 2013 using the mitochondrial cox1 gene has demonstrated significant interspecific variation. For example, Kher et al (2011) concluded that a > 5% difference in cox1 identifies different biological species of Tetrahymena, while Strüder-Kypke & Lynn (2010) concluded that this criterion rises to > 20% for biological species of Paramecium. Biological species of Tetrahymena can have identical gene sequences for SSU rRNA, and so it is best to avoid this gene as a criterion for genetic species identification for taxonomic purposes (Strüder-Kypke & Lynn 2010).…”
Section: T Spinifera (29) Hq965963mentioning
confidence: 99%