2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bargaining in competing supply chains with uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
64
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
64
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these researches on the pricing competition problem focus on the following four structures: monopoly common retailer structure [6][7][8], chain-to-chain structure [4,9,10], dual channel structure [11][12][13][14], and monopoly common manufacturer structure, which is studied in this paper. The research on the monopoly common manufacturer structure was initiated by Ingene and Parry [15], considering a coordination problem in a supply chain where a manufacturer sells its products through competing retailers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of these researches on the pricing competition problem focus on the following four structures: monopoly common retailer structure [6][7][8], chain-to-chain structure [4,9,10], dual channel structure [11][12][13][14], and monopoly common manufacturer structure, which is studied in this paper. The research on the monopoly common manufacturer structure was initiated by Ingene and Parry [15], considering a coordination problem in a supply chain where a manufacturer sells its products through competing retailers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also analyzed the impacts of the retailer's risk sensitivity on the manufacturers' equilibrium strategies. Wu et al [9] considered a joint pricing and quantity competition between two separate supply chains in random environment and explored the effects of randomness on the equilibrium behaviors of the supply chain members. Shi et al [22] utilized a game-theory-based framework to formulate the power in a supply chain and examined how power structure and demand indeterminacy affect the supply chain members' performances.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to ensure better result, the coordination between the players is essential. Combining the revenue-cost sharing contract [28][29][30] and supply chain bargaining [31][32][33], we propose an effectively coordinated mechanism.…”
Section: Supply Chain Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou and Ai (2005) showed that the difference between cost and product has an important effect on the selection of channel structure in the competition between supply chains. Wu et al (2009) considered joint pricing and quantity decisions and competition under three possible supply chain strategies: Vertical Integration (VI), Manufacturer's Stackelberg (MS), and Bargaining on the Wholesale price (BW(α), α is the bargaining parameter) over a single or infinitely many periods. They showed that, in contrast to earlier literature, using VIVI (VI in both chains) is the unique Nash Equilibrium over one period decision, while using MSMS or BW(α)BW(α) may be Nash Equilibrium over infinitely many periods.…”
Section: Competition Between Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%