1995
DOI: 10.1016/0927-5371(95)80013-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bargaining power and wages: A game-theoretic model of gender differences in union wage bargaining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Sap (1993) the relative importance of a group can under certain conditions determine the bargaining power of this group. A higher R&D intensity ratio captures to some extent the importance of R&D workers within a firm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Sap (1993) the relative importance of a group can under certain conditions determine the bargaining power of this group. A higher R&D intensity ratio captures to some extent the importance of R&D workers within a firm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be several reasons for the larger union effects for men than for women. First, women's interests may not be effectively represented by mainstream union activity (Sap, 1993), perhaps due to the marginal nature of some women employment (part-time or casual workers). Second, even if unions could effectively represent women's and men's interests equally, because some women may be more interested in non-wage benefits such as maternity leave and child care arrangements than high wages per se, the effects of unions in the case of women may not show up in their wages as much as they do for men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential explanation is differences between the nonprofit and for‐profit sectors in working conditions, stereotypes, or discriminatory behavior. These differences could be driven by different technologies that dictate different treatments (Altonji and Blank 1999), different bargaining effects and ability to extract training from workplaces (Sap 1993), or differences in organizational processes within workplaces which lead to stratification in training opportunities (Tolbert and Castilla 2017).…”
Section: Exploring Potential Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%