2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barrier Lyapunov function-based robust flight control for the ultra-low altitude airdrop under airflow disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tao et al [4] studied parafoil path following in a windy environment based on generalized predictive control. Su et al [5] studied the anti-disturbance constrained trajectory flight control for an ultra-low altitude airdrop system based on the barrier Lyapunov function. Luo et al [6] proposed an accurate flight track control approach for a parafoil, which combined ADRC with wind feedforward compensation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tao et al [4] studied parafoil path following in a windy environment based on generalized predictive control. Su et al [5] studied the anti-disturbance constrained trajectory flight control for an ultra-low altitude airdrop system based on the barrier Lyapunov function. Luo et al [6] proposed an accurate flight track control approach for a parafoil, which combined ADRC with wind feedforward compensation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with Hooke's law, the tension at the connection point between the hose and the UAV depends to some extent on the relative positions of the tanker and the UAV, indicating the requirement for a specific formation configuration between the two aircraft. However, the RFSHC is susceptible to encountering intricate external airflow disturbances, such as atmospheric turbulences and gusts [15], during flight. As a result, ensuring that the desired formation configuration between the tanker and the UAV is maintained requires careful consideration of state constraint control in RFSHC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BLF-based adaptive finite-time control was proposed in [25], which guaranteed the robust response in the presence of uncertainties. Anti-disturbance exact flight control based on the BLF-based back-stepping technique with the mash-up of a high-order sliding mode observer was proposed for ultra-low-altitude airdrop [26], but it did not consider the actuator fault. In the field of neural network control, reference [27] proposes an innovative control strategy, namely observer-based adaptive fuzzy finite-time attitude control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a multivariable adaptive control-based consensus flight control method with parametric uncertainties and unknown external disturbances was proposed for formation UAVs [30]. These controls have downsides in term that although they take the uncertainties or disturbances into account [25], they did not consider the actuator faults in the formation control [24,26]. These methods are using back-stepping control [24], BLF-based adaptive finite-time control [25], and BLF-based back-stepping control [26] to deal with uncertainties and disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%