2000
DOI: 10.1134/1.1131242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barrier photovoltaic effects in PZT ferroelectric thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ferroelectric photovoltaic effect was observed in BaTiO 3 in 1956 ͑Ref. 13 However, very lim-ited studies were on the thickness dependence of photocurrent for PLZT materials. 2 In 1974, Glass et al developed an equation to describe the relationship between the photocurrent density J and absorbed power density ␣I ͑where ␣ is the optical absorption coefficient and I is the light intensity͒ and introduced the Glass coefficient ͑Glass law J = ␣I͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ferroelectric photovoltaic effect was observed in BaTiO 3 in 1956 ͑Ref. 13 However, very lim-ited studies were on the thickness dependence of photocurrent for PLZT materials. 2 In 1974, Glass et al developed an equation to describe the relationship between the photocurrent density J and absorbed power density ␣I ͑where ␣ is the optical absorption coefficient and I is the light intensity͒ and introduced the Glass coefficient ͑Glass law J = ␣I͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a mechanism had already been postulated in 2000 to explain the photovoltaic effect in PZT(48/52). [69] On a similar note, Yang et al observed an enhancement by a factor of 2 of the photovoltage and photovoltaic current in BiFeO 3 single crystals grown with different orientations, domain patterns, or even different laboratories, by using photons carrying subbandgap energy. [70] Such enhancement was attributed to a simple electronic pumping of sub-bandgap levels situated at 2.2 eV, as the spectral photoconductive response exhibit an important response in the area between 2.2 and 2.6 eV (see Figure 10a).…”
Section: Defects: Friend or Foe?mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] However, the stability of photovoltaic output in ferroelectric thin films has not been paid attention. Device applications seem not possible without clarifying the relevant mechanism and having the stability issue solved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%