Barrier-removal plans and pedestrian infrastructure equity for people with disabilities

Eisenberg, Yochai; Hofstra, Amy; Berquist, Sierra; Gould, Robert O.; Jones, Robin

doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103356

Cited by 12 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Criteria for accessibility based on the principles of universal design at the study site refer to efforts aimed at creating environments that are easily accessible, safe, and comfortable for everyone, regardless of age, physical ability, or background [30]. These criteria involve several key aspects, such as: The presence of physical barriers such as utility poles, trees, or other public facilities located in the middle of the sidewalk can restrict maneuvering space and impede movement.…”

Section: Pedestrian Pathways Accessibility Based On Universal Design ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Inclusivity: Designing Disability Friendly Pedestrian Pathways

Adi,

Nahdatunnisa,

Heikoop

et al. 2024

IJSSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Pedestrian Pathways Accessibility Based On Universal Design ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Inclusivity: Designing Disability Friendly Pedestrian Pathways

Adi,

Nahdatunnisa,

Heikoop

et al. 2024

IJSSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In contrast, compliance-driven methods are predominantly quantitative, which relates to the large-scale nature of sidewalk networks in municipalities, and are conducted by professionals. Efforts to collect compliance data use on-the-ground auditing (e.g., walk audit using measuring tools), remote auditing (e.g., through Google Street View) [25,26], or automated auditing through computer vision, computer learning (AI), and socio-technological approaches such as crowdsourcing [20,27,28]. Because of the vast amount of infrastructure to audit, on-the-ground auditing is time and labor intensive [29].…”

Section: Accessibility Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While numerous studies have explored approaches, methods, and tools for collecting accessibility data [20,[25][26][27][28], few studies have explored if and how such data are used in practice or how they would be used by key stakeholders, including urban and transportation planners, accessibility specialists such as ADA coordinators, disability advocacy organizations, and people with disabilities and their caregivers. As such, we lack an understanding of what makes accessibility data useful and how different uses are considered in the design of data and the implementation of data collection efforts.…”

Section: Accessibility Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple-Stakeholder Perspectives on Accessibility Data and the Use of Socio-Technical Tools to Improve Sidewalk Accessibility

Labbé,

Eisenberg,

Snyder

et al. 2023

Disabilities

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For people with disabilities, accessible pedestrian infrastructure can support independence, mobility, and improved quality of life. Yet, most pedestrian infrastructure presents barriers that impede movement. A major challenge for cities to improve pedestrian accessibility is the lack of reliable data on sidewalk accessibility. Little is known about the type of data needed for cities, as well as how different stakeholders perceive and use sidewalk data. Therefore, this study seeks to explore the perceptions of multiple stakeholders on the use, gathering, and application of sidewalk accessibility data. We conducted a series of workshops with 51 participants, including people with disabilities, caregivers, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) coordinators, and urban planners, to discuss sidewalk accessibility data and data collection tools. We used the socio-technological tool Project Sidewalk as an example. Participants identified various uses for the accessibility data such as route planning, barrier removal plans, and advocacy, and discussed issues of usability, trust, access, and accessibility of the data and tools. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of important factors that impact the use and application of accessibility data and how to implement accessibility data collection initiatives that utilize socio-technological approaches such as crowdsourcing.

show abstract

“…52 Despite decades of civil rights legislation for people with disabilities in the United States, much of the pedestrian infrastructure in both cities and schools remains inaccessible. 53 The most common pattern identified across countries, including the United States, is the persistence of disparities. 54 Indonesia's Law on Persons with Disabilities mandates equal access to infrastructure and is further reinforced by the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing Regulation No.8/PRT/M/2019, which provides Technical Guidelines for Disability-Friendly Buildings.…”

Section: Challenges To Fulfilling the Right To Education Of Persons W...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Higher Education with Disabilities Policy: Ensuring Equality Inclusive Education in Indonesia, Singapore and United States

Wardani Amnesti,

Jundiani,

Zulaichah

et al. 2023

JHCLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are still relatively few people with disabilities who complete their education up to the university level in Indonesia. In contrast, Singapore and the United States are known for their high levels of innovation, especially in promoting equality in education. Three countries—Indonesia, Singapore, and the United States—share a common commitment to realizing the protection of disability rights. This research employs normative legal research methods, utilizing both statutory and comparative approaches. The findings of this study reveal that Singapore's universities have the highest percentage of disability-friendly institutions, with approximately 60% of colleges maintaining specialized Disability Services units. In the United States, only 4.7% of colleges offer Disability Services, while in Indonesia, the figure stands at 1.48%. Substantial, structural, and cultural challenges persist in all three countries when it comes to fulfilling the right to education, particularly concerning funding policies. Each nation needs to cultivate a culture of anti-discrimination in disability education. Notably, Indonesia has yet to implement an inclusive curriculum in higher education. This paper holds significant importance in the context of improving educational services for individuals with disabilities, ultimately contributing to the realization of equality in the education system.

show abstract

Barrier-removal plans and pedestrian infrastructure equity for people with disabilities

Cited by 12 publications

References 34 publications

Enhancing Inclusivity: Designing Disability Friendly Pedestrian Pathways

Enhancing Inclusivity: Designing Disability Friendly Pedestrian Pathways

Multiple-Stakeholder Perspectives on Accessibility Data and the Use of Socio-Technical Tools to Improve Sidewalk Accessibility

Higher Education with Disabilities Policy: Ensuring Equality Inclusive Education in Indonesia, Singapore and United States

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About