Free energy barriers to ring inversion of 3,3-dimethyl-, 4,4-dimethyl-, and 5,s-dimethylcycloheptene were found to be much smaller than those of corresponding benzocycloheptene derivatives but show the same trend. This observation strongly suggests that the chair conformationof both types of molecules interconverts through the same mechanism. On the other hand, the AGf value for 4,4,6,6-tetramethylcycloheptene is about 3 kcal/mol out of line from that expected from a consideration of the behavior of the corresponding benzocycloheptene derivative. An explanation is offered.Les barrikres d'tnergie libre pour l'inversion des dimethyl-3,3, dimethyl-4,4 et dimethyl-5,5 cycloheptimes, tout en conservant la m&me tendance, sont plus faibles que celles qui caractkrisent les derives correspondants du benzocycloheptkne. Cette observation indique que la conformation chaise des deux classes de molecules s'inverse par le m&me mecanisme. Par contre, la valeur de AG+ pour le tetramethyl-4,4,6,6 cycloheptene est environ 3 kcal/mol plus elevke que celle attendue aprks examen des benzocycloheptknes correspondants. Une explication est presentee.